Issue - meetings
5 a - Briefing Note and RAG Rating calculation
Meeting: 25/01/2012 - Health and Adult Social Care Overview and Scrutiny Panel (Item 54)
54 DRAFT BUDGET SCRUTINY RECOMMENDATIONS
PDF 69 KB
The panel will receive extracts from budget scrutiny papers regarding Health and Adult Social Care which was presented to the Overview and Scrutiny Management Board on the 11 January 2012. Draft recommendations will follow after the 18January 2012.
Additional documents:
- 4e Community Services Scorecard, 11/01/2012 Overview and Scrutiny Management Board, item 54
PDF 153 KB
- Copy of 20111122 Delivery Plan Revised Community Services, 13/12/2011 Cabinet, 11/01/2012 Overview and Scrutiny Management Board, item 54
PDF 45 KB
- 7a PCT briefing note (5) for OSC Jan 2012, 11/01/2012 Overview and Scrutiny Management Board, item 54
PDF 117 KB
Minutes:
The panel’s lead officer provided an update following the Overview and Scrutiny Management Board’s scrutiny of the council’s and strategic partners’ budget and corporate plans for 2012 / 13. The lead officer provided an indication of where recommendations were likely to be made, which included that –
|
(a) Management Board considered that the extent of demographic changes and the fundamental changes to service delivery in terms of health and social care were not adequately reflected in the corporate plan;
|
|
(b) the Health and Adult Social Care Overview and Scrutiny Panel would be provided with an update of the results of the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment and its use in the development of the Health and Wellbeing strategy;
|
|
(c) Adult Social Care would be asked to conduct a market impact assessment, particularly with regard to the impact on the adult social care workforce;
|
|
(d) greater voluntary and community sector representation should be considered for the developing Health and Wellbeing Board;
|
|
(e) the Cabinet should consider discretionary funding for adaptations.
|
In response to questions from members of the panel it was reported that-
|
(f) the demand for adaptations was currently outstripping supply;
|
|
(g) the sexual assault referral centre was one of only two in the peninsula and was regarded as best practice. The service had been subject to annual funding commitments from partners for some time, a longer term funding commitment from partners was being sought;
|
|
(h) the Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention programme was the large scale transformational programme for the National Health Service which was hoped would deliver 20 billion of efficiency savings. The panel had received updates on various elements of the programme. A further update would be provided to the panel at a future meeting. |
Agreed that an update on the QIPP programme would be provided to a future meeting of the panel.
Meeting: 11/01/2012 - Overview and Scrutiny Management Board (Item 78)
78 Budget challenge scorecards by Directorate
PDF 102 KB
- Scorecard Explanation Note
- Community Services
- Services for Children and Young People
- Development and Regeneration
- Corporate Support
- Chief Executive
Additional documents:
- 4e Community Services Scorecard, item 78
PDF 153 KB
- 4e Services for C&YP Scorecard, item 78
PDF 134 KB
- 4e Development & Regen Scorecard, item 78
PDF 201 KB
- 4e Corporate Support Scorecard, item 78
PDF 195 KB
- 4e Chief Exec Scorecard, item 78
PDF 77 KB
