No. |
Item |
32. |
Declarations of Interest
Councillors will be asked to make any
declarations of interest in respect of items on the agenda.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
There were no declarations of interest made by
Members in accordance with the code of conduct.
|
33. |
Minutes PDF 162 KB
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on
10 October 2022.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee agreed the minutes of the
meetings held on 5 September 2022, and 29 September 2022 as an
accurate record.
|
34. |
Chair's Urgent Business
To receive reports on business which in the
opinion of the Chair, should be brought forward for urgent
consideration.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
There were no items of Chair’s urgent
business.
|
35. |
Policy Brief PDF 149 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Policy Brief was not introduced by an
officer and instead moved straight to questions from Members.
In response to questions raised it was
reported that -
(a)
|
it was anticipated that voter ID would be
required for next year’s elections however this would be
clarified later in the agenda when the Elections Bill Implications
item was to be discussed;
|
(b)
|
future policy brief reports would include any
impacts or benefits to Plymouth as well as how the Council would
take action to respond if required;
|
(c)
|
the Policy Brief
referred to the call for evidence on the Home Office Afghan
Resettlement Scheme – this was scheduled on the
committee’s work programme for 14 December 2022 meeting.
|
The Committee agreed:
1.
|
that future policy brief reports would include
any impacts or benefits to Plymouth as well as how the Council
would take action to respond if required;
|
2.
|
to note the Policy
Brief.
|
|
|
Order of Business
The Chair agreed to change the order of
business to facilitate good meeting management.
Additional documents:
|
36. |
Corporate Plan Performance and Risk Report - To Follow PDF 174 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Corporate Plan Performance and Risk Report
was not introduced by a Cabinet Member and instead moved straight
to questions by Members. Councillor Shayer (Cabinet Member for
Finance & Economy), Ross Jago (Head of Governance, Performance
and Risk) and Andrew Loton (Senior Performance Advisor) were in
attendance.
In response to questions raised it was
reported that:
(a)
|
risk 12 in the report regarding the Council
not meeting its obligation to keep data secure by failing to adhere
to data protection act regulations was an identified risk and not
something that had happened; a description of the risk was
contained within the report as well as the mitigation response and
actions undertaken to ensure that to the Council’s best
ability it didn’t happen; cyber security was also to be
discussed at the panel’s scrutiny meeting in February
2023;
|
(b)
|
risk 14 in the report regarding the Council
not meeting its legal obligations regarding the health and safety
of the workforce was an identified risk of the situation and the
mitigation was included in the report; the Big Listen was to be
discussed later in the meeting and this formed part of the
mitigation of this risk;
|
(c)
|
the red risk in relation to staff sickness
levels was acknowledged however measures were in place to address
what had been identified as an issue affecting the workforce; the
Council had a well-developed policy for absence and sickness and it
was highlighted that the welfare of staff was important;
|
(d)
|
a written response would be provided to
Members upon the financial implications of the Council’s
decision to end the garden waste service early therefore affecting
the overall recycling rate in quarter two due to a lower volume of
composted waste than in previous years, specifically when it was
considered that recycling was sold on for other use.
|
The Committee agreed:
1.
|
that a written response would be provided to
Members upon the financial implications of the Council’s
decision to end the garden waste service early therefore affecting
the overall recycling rate in quarter two due to a lower volume of
composted waste than in previous years, specifically when it was
considered that recycling was sold on for other use;
|
2.
|
to note the
Corporate Plan Quarter Two Performance and Risk Update.
|
|
37. |
Return to Work Safely - The Big Listen Update - To Follow PDF 224 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Shayer (Cabinet Member for Finance
& Economy), Giles Perritt (Assistant Chief Executive) and
Alison Mills (Head of HR Consultancy) presented the Return to Work
Safely (The Big Listen Update) to Members. The three Union
representatives, Kevin Treweeks (Unison Lead Representative),
Sharon Battishill (Unite Lead Representative) and Trish Small (GMB
Lead Representative) were also in attendance in order to provide a
staff side perspective.
The following key points were highlighted to
Members:
(a)
|
the report shared the main findings of the Big
Listen staff survey and the information provided was taken across
all council employees; there was currently no benchmarking data
undertaken by other councils to measure the information however it
presented a clean cut representation of a post covid council;
|
(b)
|
the Council conducted the Big Listen survey in
June/ July 2022 and the report shared the headline findings and
provided information as to how the Council would respond to the
findings from the survey;
|
(c)
|
the survey linked to the Council’s
People Strategy and had a 71% engagement level, two thirds of staff
were proud to work for the Council, seven in ten people considered
the Council was a good employer, the largest improvement was made
in the satisfaction levels to staff working environment, 87% of
staff were aware of their responsibilities and duties, 65%
responded that they got development or training needed to do their
job safely and 82% of staff felt that they were treated fairly,
respectfully and without discrimination;
|
(d)
|
the report also
highlighted how change was managed across the Council, career
progression within the Council and the confidence in how the survey
results would be responded to; plans were detailed in the covering
report on focus groups being arranged to take forward actions.
|
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(e)
|
it was difficult to encourage staff to speak
and engage with surveys however those that did were thanked; it was
highlighted that the response rate of 51% was a top quartile rate
and was considered very high as the average rate was 25%;
|
(f)
|
in terms of the 51% response rate, Sharon
Battishill (Unite Lead Representative) considered that front line
workers were not heard and generally did not participate in surveys
as they did not work on computers so didn’t receive an
electronic version of the survey however also didn’t receive
paper copies; they also had to complete surveys in their own
personal time other than during working hours. There was a high
density of front line workers in Street Scene and Waste with
reading and writing therefore the feedback would be low from those
areas;
|
(g)
|
in terms of the 51% response rate Kevin
Treweeks (Unison Lead Representative) advised that he considered
some people may not have participated because they believe that if
they didn’t have anything nice to say they shouldn’t
say anything at all;
|
(h)
|
an external company
was used to conduct the survey in order to ensure anonymity if
people considered they could be identified by their ...
view the full minutes text for item 37.
|
|
38. |
Finance and Capital Monitoring Report - Month 6 (to include a focus on the Children's budget) PDF 980 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Carlyle (Cabinet Member for
Education, Skills and Children and Young People), David Northey
(Interim Section 151 Officer) and Jane Anstis (Service Director for
Children, Young People and Families) were in attendance at the
meeting – it was highlighted that the information had been
published alongside the agenda therefore the item moved straight to
questions.
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(a)
|
in the Finance and
Capital Monitoring Report month 6, it set out the gross budget, the
forecast and the net variance for month 6 to the end of the year
which was £2.217m; the slide in the pack detailed what the
pressures in month 6 were, the areas of concern and the drivers
including SEND, transport, placements. There were already plans in
place for mitigation, therefore it was now to consider how those
plans were progressing;
|
(b)
|
the sum of
£500k identified in the report as ‘partner
income’ was put down as a mitigation and conversations had
started with partners. Officers were talking to the ICB regarding
their overall agreement with the Council and had discussed that
rather than the current process which included a child hitting a
trigger point and the ICB agreeing to support a specific percentage
of the cost, it was hoped that changes were made to the overall
agreement in that an average was taken over a set period of time
and the sum of money provided to the Council allowing officers to
work within a set budget target and agreed envelope of funding.
Officers had written to the ICB and they had released
£829k;
|
(c)
|
negotiations with the ICB had started and help
was welcomed from any forum in order to expedite conversations and
change the way in the process was currently working;
|
(d)
|
the Council had 12 social workers due to start
in February 2023 – it was considered that agency cost and
bespoke placements made up a significant amount of the cost in the
department and caused the most budgetary pressures. The
introduction of the 12 social workers would encourage a greater
saving;
|
(e)
|
the numbers for
looked after children were starting to fall overall – there
had been a recent slight increase however the numbers were starting
to decrease. Bespoke placements had also started to reduce and were
currently at one down from three. These placements held the
greatest costs for the Council;
|
(f)
|
the SEND budget was
set at £3.1m with a deficit of £0.284; it was
considered that the pressure on this part of the budget was due to
short breaks. It was highlighted that the Council aimed to continue
to offer these services and wanted to prioritise looked after
children;
|
(g)
|
the number of children with SEND had not
increased; Councillor Carlyle had been provided with updated
figures and agreed to provide a written response to Members
outlining the updated information on the figures and budget;
|
(h)
|
the Council had recently created a new interim
post to specifically focus upon:
the cohort of ...
view the full minutes text for item 38.
|
|
39. |
Elections Bill Implications
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair advised Members that the Government
had confirmed that the Elections Act was to be introduced in time
for the May 2023 elections; the Head of Electoral Services would be
present at the 14 December 2022 Performance, Finance and Customer
Focus Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting in order to provide
an update. It was acknowledged that the elections team would be
busy planning and working to elections deadlines however it was
considered that the Elections Act update could not feasibly be
moved to the panel’s next scheduled meeting in February as it
would be too late to scrutinise this issue prior to the May 2023
elections.
A request was made for the link to the
statutory instruments to be provided to Members.
|
40. |
Bereavement Services Update - To Follow PDF 150 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair introduced the Bereavement Services
Update item and advised that a brief paper had been provided. It
was highlighted that this item had been initially scheduled as a
standing item on the panel’s agendas due to concerns with the
new provision, however the executive board had since been set up
and the report detailed that things were running to time. It was
proposed that the Bereavement Services Update was no longer a
standing item on the scrutiny agenda and that instead an update
would be provided in six months’ time with a detailed report
upon the transition to opening and the future of the Western Mill
and Efford sites.
In response to a question raised it was
reported by the Chair that the panel had scrutinised costs,
timings, the contract, the accountability of Cabinet Members, the
cross party approach, and were therefore satisfied that the
crematorium project was no longer escalating – this was
further satisfied by the contact for the project having been
finalised.
The Committee agreed that the Bereavement
Services Update would no longer be a standing item on the
panel’s work programme, and that a detailed report would be
provided to scrutiny in six months’ time upon the transition
to opening and the future of the Western Mill and Efford sites.
|
41. |
Leisure Services Update - To Follow
Additional documents:
Minutes:
This item was not discussed in part 1.
|
42. |
Work Programme PDF 157 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair introduced the work programme item
and highlighted the following:
·
|
that the digital transformation and inclusion
item should be included with the Customer Services Strategy
update;
|
·
|
that the recommendations from the Armed Forces
Covenant would be presented to a future scrutiny panel for sign
off;
|
·
|
that Equality and Diversity would be scheduled
for the February meeting and would focus upon hate crime;
|
·
|
the aim was to
efficiently timetable remaining items on the work programme where
possible in order to prevent too many items being scheduled for the
new municipal year.
|
|
43. |
Tracking Decisions PDF 325 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair highlighted to Members that all
recommendations and actions from previous meetings (except for one)
had now been provided and greyed out as complete on the document.
The Democratic Advisor was thanked for her work in sourcing and
communicating responses to Members.
Under this item the amount and frequency of
‘to follow’ papers was raised by Members as well as the
challenges experienced in accessing the information, especially
when reports were restricted.
The committee agreed that the Chair would
write to the Chief Executive expressing the concerns of the
Performance, Finance and Customer Focus Overview and Scrutiny Panel
regarding the amount and frequency of ‘to follow’
papers.
|
44. |
Exempt Business
To consider passing a resolution under Section
100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 to exclude the press and
public from the meeting for the following item(s) of business on
the grounds that it (they) involve the likely disclosure of exempt
information as defined in paragraph(s) 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A
of the Act, as amended by the Freedom of Information Act 2000
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Agreed that under Section 100(4) of the Local
Government Act 1972, to exclude the press and public from the
meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that
involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in
paragraph 3 of Part I of Schedule 12A of the Act, as amended by the
Freedom of Information Act 2000.
|
45. |
Bereavement Services Update - To Follow
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Bereavement Services Update was not
discussed by Members.
|
46. |
Leisure Services Update - To Follow
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Leisure Services Update was discussed by
Members.
|