No. |
Item |
54. |
Declarations of Interest
Councillors will be asked to make any
declarations of interest in respect of items on the agenda.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The following declarations of interest were
made by Members in accordance with the code of conduct:
Member
|
Subject
|
Reason
|
Interest
|
Councillor
Briars-Delve
|
Minute number 63
‘Our Commitment to Equality and Diversity’.
|
Employed by Four
Greens Community Trust.
|
Personal
|
Councillor
Harrison
|
Minute number 63
‘Our Commitment to Equality and Diversity’.
|
Employed by Four
Greens Community Trust.
|
Personal
|
Councillor
Partridge
|
Minute number 63
‘Our Commitment to Equality and Diversity’.
|
Is a Non-Executive
Director of the Four Greens Community Trust.
|
Personal.
|
|
55. |
Minutes PDF 217 KB
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on
7 November 2022 (Select Review), 18 November 2022, 30 November 2022
and 14 December 2022.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee agreed the minutes of 7 November
2022, 18 November 2022, 30 November 2022 and 14 December 2022 as an
accurate record of the meeting.
|
56. |
Chair's Urgent Business
To receive reports on business which in the
opinion of the Chair, should be brought forward for urgent
consideration.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
There were no items of Chair’s urgent
business.
|
57. |
Appeal Against Petition Response PDF 157 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Emma Jackman (Head of Legal Services) and
Councillor Stoneman (Cabinet Member for Climate Change and
Governance) presented the Appeal Against
Petition Response to Members and highlighted the following key
points:
(a)
the report contained in the agenda was
in relation to an appeal submitted following a petition that was
debated at Council on 30 January 2023 in relation to the Armada Way
Trees. The Committee was asked to consider the appeal and determine
whether the response from Full Council was appropriate, or not; the
petition submitted had over 5000 signatures and therefore under the
guidance, the officers were required to forward it on to Full
Council for debate;
(b)
the appeal was appended at the report;
the rules required it to go to the next available committee which
was this meeting (22 February 2023 scrutiny). The petition guidance
was appended at page 63 onwards – paragraph 2 outlined what a
petition must include – paragraph 3 detailed the acceptance
of the petition and its validity – paragraph 4 listed
possible responses to a petition – paragraph 6 required that where a petition had over 5000
signatures there was an automatic referral to Full Council for
debate;
(c)
on receipt the petition was checked for signatures and numbers in
order to determine where it should be dealt with – this was
undertaken by an officer plotting the postcodes and determining if
they were in a reasonable area in terms of Plymouth city (such as
commuting areas). It was submitted to Full Council with further
information which was included as part of the email, however that
was not included in the text on the online petition. When the
petition was referred to, it was what was included, what people
were reading and signing in support of – as such, the word
document that accompanied the petition was not included in the
papers because it didn’t form part of the petition that
people were asked to sign in support of. However, at Full Council,
the petitioner had 5 minutes to present the case to Members and
make any additional representations;
(d)
Members were advised that STRAW Plymouth (Save the TRees of Armada
Way) had sent an email to the Committee; the Head of Legal Services
highlighted the following in response to points raised in the
email:
i.
on 14 February 2023, STRAW Plymouth were informed by email by the
Head of Legal Services at 18.34pm that the appeal against the
petition response was on the agenda for the 22 February 2023
Performance, Finance and Customer Focus Overview and Scrutiny
Committee – a hyperlink to the agenda was also provided. They
were aware in good time that the report attached as part of the
agenda was to be submitted and were aware of the nature of the
report;
ii.
as the petition had 5000 signatures it
meant that it was an automatic referral to Full Council –
officers could not make any other decision other than to refer the
petition to Full Council for ...
view the full minutes text for item 57.
|
58. |
Policy Brief PDF 149 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Kevin McKenzie (Policy and Intelligence
Advisor) was in attendance for the Policy Brief.
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(a)
|
further detail upon the developing 3-year
Plymouth Prevent Action Plan would be discussed later in the
meeting;
|
(b)
|
photo identification would be a requirement to
enable people to vote in upcoming elections; this was something
that the Audit and Governance Committee had created a working group
to consider.
|
The Committee agreed:
1.
|
that the Audit and Governance Committee Sub
Group dealing with the Election Cycle/ voter identification would
be referred to in the Councillor Bulletin to enable Councillor
input;
|
2.
|
to note the policy brief.
|
|
59. |
Finance Monitoring Report - Month 9 PDF 675 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Shayer (Deputy Leader & Cabinet
Member for Finance and Economy) briefly introduced the Finance
Monitoring Report Month 9 and advised Members that pressure was
continuing to be applied to the Council’s budget and that
progress was being made; it was believed that the Council would
achieve a balanced budget by the end of the financial year.
Members did not have any questions.
The Committee agreed to note the Finance
Monitoring Report Month 9.
|
60. |
Corporate Plan Performance Report (to follow) PDF 158 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Ross Jago (Head of Governance, Performance and
Risk) and Councillor Shayer (Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for
Finance and Economy) were in attendance for the Corporate Plan
Performance Report.
The Chair briefly informed Members that the
report was submitted to the Committee late via a supplement pack as
it had only recently received senior management sign off. It was
also highlighted that Members were having first sight of the
report, as it hadn’t yet been discussed by Cabinet.
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(a)
|
in terms of the
drop in percentage of recycling and composting rates between Q2 at
37% and Q3 at 31%, it was acknowledged that the change to the
recycling and garden waste collection scheme could have had a minor
impact on the drop in figures. It was also highlighted that the
numbers of residents now working at home was potentially having an
impact upon the figures as some resident’s didn’t
properly separate their recycling therefore contributing to mixed
waste;
|
(b)
|
it was recognised by the Cabinet Member that
the Council needed to do further work in order to achieve the 65%
recycling target by 2034;
|
(c)
|
in terms of the continued increase of full
time equivalent (FTE) days lost due to staff sicknesses in a
rolling 12 months period, it was acknowledged that the Council
needed to be more granular in its understanding of the reasons why
the levels of staff sickness were continuing to rise;
|
(d)
|
in relation to the downward trend from a green
to red rating in the percentage of city residents who thought the
local area was a place where people from different backgrounds get
on well together, this had dropped from 55% to 42%; it was
suggested this was due to covid however it was hoped that the
community builders programme would be instrumental in bringing out
some greater community cohesion, especially amongst the ethnic
minorities in the city.
|
Under this item the Chair referred to the drop
in percentages from 34% to 27% in terms of how the local community
got involved in local decisions, as well as the increase from 38%
to 42% for those that didn’t know how to get involved in
local decision making. It was expressed that it was important that
the Council was seen to be democratically accountable and welcoming
of public engagement – this was also a requirement of the
Council’s Constitution. A suggestion was made to the Chair
and Vice Chair of the Audit and Governance Committee (who were both
present at the scrutiny meeting as sitting Members or substitute
Members) that when their review of the Council’s Constitution
was undertaken, that necessary steps were taken to specifically
reduce the decline in public engagement with the Council, and to
ensure that local democracy was prioritised.
The Committee agreed to note the Corporate
Plan Performance Report.
|
61. |
Strategic Risk Update PDF 168 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Ross Jago (Head of Governance, Risk and
Performance) and Councillor Shayer (Deputy Leader and Cabinet
Member for Finance and Economy) were in attendance for the
Strategic Risk Update.
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(a)
|
in terms of risk 11 ‘The Council having
insufficient workforce capacity and resilience to deliver the
required range of services to meet statutory obligations and
administration priorities’, pay levels were not specifically
excluded from the list of reasons as to why the Council was
experiencing issues with recruitment and retention of staff;
|
(b)
|
the Council considered all methods of
encouraging apprenticeships and employed apprentices across the
whole range of the workforce; this was a recent scrutiny
recommendation and was also key to the Council’s People
Strategy;
|
(c)
|
in terms of risk 18 ‘Risk of financial
impact of delivering proposed changes to Waste Services as set out
in the Government's Draft Environment Bill’ and the possible
necessity to have separate food waste collections, it was confirmed
that the Council was aware of the legislation however it
hadn’t yet been informed sufficiently to provide enough
detail as to next steps to be taken.
|
Under this item Councillor Lowry advised
Members as to his perception of the role and responsibility of both
the Performance, Finance and Customer Focus Overview and Scrutiny
Committee and the Audit and Governance Committee in terms of the
risk register. It was highlighted that the Audit and Governance
Committee had overall responsibility for the strategic risk
register but were sharing that risk register with scrutiny in order
to see items on the risk register that were relevant to the
scrutiny committee and which therefore might wish to be added to
the work programme. The Audit and Governance Committee would simply
point out that this risk was increasing, maintaining its level or
decreasing and would ask others to do a piece of work on that
subject matter. The Chair responded
that it was important that both committees worked together on
important issues.
The Committee agreed
1.
|
to recommend to the Audit and Governance
Committee that they pay particular attention to risk 11 ‘The
Council having insufficient workforce capacity and resilience to
deliver the required range of services to meet statutory
obligations and administration priorities’, specifically the
pay conditions of staff and staff retention when next discussing
the strategic risk register;
|
2.
|
to include Plan for Homes to their work
programme, with specific consideration of risk 19 ‘Risk of
failing to deliver the range of housing to meet Plymouth’s
need’;
|
3.
|
to recommend to the Growth and Infrastructure
Overview and Scrutiny Committee that they add to their work
programme risk 18 ‘Risk of financial impact of delivering
proposed changes to Waste Services as set out in the Government's
Draft Environment Bill’ from the Strategic Risk Register,
specifically the potential impact this legislation would have on
food waste disposal;
|
4.
|
to recommend to the
Growth and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Committee that they
add to their work programme risk 21 ‘Viability of commercial
...
view the full minutes text for item 61.
|
|
62. |
Cyber Security - to follow PDF 248 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
John Finch (Information Governance Manager),
Peter Honeywell (Transformation Architecture Manager) and
Councillor Shayer (Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Finance and
Economy) presented the Cyber Security report to Members and
highlighted the following key points:
(a)
|
the threat from
cyber-attacks was rising within the public sector with several
councils having suffered major attacks in the last three years
which has resulted in some cases in the total loss of IT services.
There was a major focus within central government and the Local
Government Association to ensure that local authorities reduced
their exposure to cyber-attacks and have the appropriate business
continuity processes in place to reduce the impact;
|
(b)
|
the report set out
the different scenarios that the Council may face with each
scenario assessed for the impact on the Council; the report then
covered the action the Council had taken to reduce the impact of
the attack; it was considered that there were significant
parallels to what was carried out in
the commercial world.
|
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(c)
|
enterprise grade applications were used by the
Council in its cyber security covering monitoring, detection and
protection activity; there were many layers of those defences
including active detecting software looking at activity in and out
of the Council’s estate, trying to identify threats and
attacks before they penetrated the device or the services
targeted;
|
(d)
|
the Council was increasingly moving its
software to the Cloud; it was considered that this gave additional
cyber security and also offered an opportunity to buy in a
different way without the capital investment associated with on
premise type solutions;
|
(e)
|
an un-editable backup software was adopted by
the Council; this meant that physical devices that were used were
complex to override therefore creating a way of avoiding some of
the threat that ransomware presented to the Council;
|
(f)
|
the Council was
still using CareFirst for Adults Services and some of Children's
Services data. Some of the functionality in Children's data hadn't
yet migrated across to the Eclipse programme so that programme
would continue for the rest of this year. With regards some of the
ransomware attacks that they have received, it was difficult to say
what data they had extracted, if any, but there were processes in
place to assess the impact, assess what data has been extracted,
and then officers would work with children services to minimise the
impact on the client. One of the most crucial things about the
Council’s data breach management process was the impact that
information could have on a client - this impact would be minimised
where possible. Moving data records to Eclipse reduced the risk
considerably, as it was a cloud hosted service;
|
(g)
|
the Information
Governance Manager was a member of a regional forum on
cybersecurity which had most local authorities in the southwest
from Gloucestershire, Dorset, to Cornwall. This forum linked in
with a national meeting which was convened on a monthly basis with
the National Cybersecurity Centre and various ...
view the full minutes text for item 62.
|
|
|
Change to the Order of the Agenda
The Committee agreed to change the order of
items to be discussed on the agenda in order to facilitate better
meeting management.
Additional documents:
|
63. |
Tracking Decisions PDF 357 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Chair introduced the tracking decisions
item and advised Members that the majority of actions from previous
meetings had been completed. It was acknowledged that the
completion of actions had improved throughout the year which was
positive; officers were thanked for their work in providing
responses.
It was highlighted by the Chair that he had
not yet written to all staff thanking those that had completed the
staff survey; this was an action from a previous meeting however
the response provided by the Service Director indicated that this
was not required as the Chief Executive had already thanked staff
herself.
The Chair advised Members that, with the
support of the Committee, he would still like to thank staff from a
Member perspective in order to demonstrate that their opinions were
important, that they had been listened to, and to encourage them to
undertake the survey again in the future.
Members noted the update and the tracking
decisions document.
|
64. |
Our Commitment to Equality and Diversity PDF 154 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Smith (Cabinet Member for Homes and
Communities), Laura Hill (Policy and Intelligence Advisor) and Kim
Brown (Service Director for HR and Organisational Development)
presented the ‘Out Commitment to Equality and
Diversity’ report to Members and highlighted the following
key points:
(a)
|
the Council was
committed to meeting its public sector equality duty, and was
working hard to promote equality, celebrate diversity and support
community cohesion. There was also a commitment to treating
customers and employees with respect and dignity and understand the
barriers that different communities in the city face. The ambition
was to create a city where an outstanding quality of life was
enjoyed by everyone;
|
(b)
|
the commitment to
equality and diversity paper demonstrated the progress that the
Council had made in meeting its public sector equality duty, and
set out how the Council had been promoting equality during the past
year. Some of the work delivered included involving members through
a cross party equalities Working Group. The Group was scheduled to
meet four times a year to deliver the city survey and using the
insights to inform the development of the community builders
programme, which provided additional engagement capacity in some of
our most deprived wards, working in partnership with local
organisations to improve the accessibility of events, supporting
employee networks, supporting employees to effectively consider
equality and diversity during procurement activities, and decision
making;
|
(c)
|
a new equality and
diversity action plan for 2023/24 was developed in consultation
with the Corporate Equality Group and the Equalities Working Group;
the action plan aimed to build upon the good work from previous
action plans and the completion of actions allowed the Council
continue its journey toward excellence on the equality framework
for local government.
|
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(e)
|
the majority of Members had completed the
Equality and Diversity training; this was provided by the LGA
therefore Members were required to notify their completion of the
course to the Council so that it could be accurately recorded;
Figures of those having completed the course would be provided to
Members;
|
(f)
|
a session on equality and diversity was
already worked into the new Councillor Induction Programme and this
would continue to be scheduled in the future to promote the
importance of equality and diversity;
|
(g)
|
the training on equality and diversity run by
the LGA was considered basic and more of an introductory level,
there was an ambition to create an enhanced training programme for
Members that moved beyond the introduction of topics and
demonstrated how Councillors behave and engage in the
community;
|
(h)
|
a written response would be provided as to if
there was an industrial diseases register maintained by the Council
for local residents where those with disabilities were
registered;
|
(i)
|
when a customer accessed Council services,
data was collected in order to provide appropriate support in an
inclusive manner;
|
(j)
|
a written response would be provided to
Members as to if the public sector equality duty extended
...
view the full minutes text for item 64.
|
|
65. |
Safer Plymouth Update PDF 680 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Patel (Cabinet Member for Customer
Services, Leisure and Sport), Matt Garrett (Service Director for
Community Connections), Matt Longman (Community Safety Partnership
Chair), Siobhan Logue (Technical Lead Community Safety) and Tracey
Naismith (Operational Manager Community Connections) presented the
Safer Plymouth Update and highlighted the following:
(a)
|
the report produced evidenced the great work
around the area of hate crime being delivered in partnership across
the city and overseen by the community safety partnership;
|
(b)
|
following the management of risk in law
enforcement workshops in September, Safer Plymouth highlighted
within the Strategic Crime Assessment, the need to continue to
understand the impact of hate crime within the city. There had been
a drive to report a crime when they happen, increase community
cohesion, and empower individuals to know that hate crime was
completely unacceptable. This was pushed by the Safer Community
steam group within Safer Plymouth where multiple agencies met
bi-monthly to discuss various operational community safety issues,
including hate crime;
|
(c)
|
Safer Plymouth was a trauma informed Community
Safety Partnership and had at its core, the welfare of residents in
mind working towards preventing adverse childhood experiences.
Devon and Cornwall Police had a diverse communities team who worked
at building trust, community cohesion and working on breaking down
barriers to reporting. This team worked closely with the Council
and Safer Plymouth in order to provide a joined up response to hate
crime reinforcing its unacceptability within the city;
|
(d)
|
understanding the impact of a crime on people
was paramount to identifying ways to prevent it. Positive work was
going on in the city and initiatives such as safer delivery
schemes, various activities in Hate Crime Awareness Week, and
greater third party reporting network, contributed to tackling the
area of hate crime making all communities feel safer;
|
(e)
|
education was a key area of focus when
tackling hate crime; the unacceptability of hate crime was key to preventing it for future
generations. The police have been working with a number of schools
to provide this input. However, this was an area looking to have
further work.
|
|
|
In response to questions raised it was
reported that –
(f)
|
the reporting of transgender hate crimes in
any area of the UK was very low; reporting was very slowly
increasing in Plymouth over a number of years which was considered
positive. It was suggested that this demonstrated that people were
gradually more likely to engage, and that there was a growing
confidence to report or just a wider response to the city to have
an open conversation around transgender issues. Councillors were
encouraged to signpost people affected by hate crimes to the
Police;
|
(g)
|
the Diverse Community Team spent time working
in schools in the city delivering a programme of work; it was
considered that the more work that could be done in schools, the
better. Police Cadets and the Mini Police was also a way of
engaging with young people on wider issues and delivering the
message;
|
(h)
|
it was considered that there ...
view the full minutes text for item 65.
|
|
66. |
Work Programme PDF 168 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee discussed the work programme and
agreed:
1.
|
that controlled parking zones would be removed
from the work programme;
|
2.
|
the Equality and Diversity Select Committee
Review to be removed;
|
3.
|
the Homelessness/
Community Empowerment Select Committee Review is to be removed from
the work programme.
|
Under this item the Committee thanked the
Chair and Vice Chair for their stewardship of the Committee for
2022/23 and also thanked officers for their support.
|