Agenda and draft minutes

Venue: Council House, Plymouth

Contact: Jamie Sheldon  Email: democraticservices@plymouth.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

70.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 80 KB

To approve and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 23 February 2026 as a correct record.

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting which took place on 23 February 2026 were agreed as a true and accurate record.

 

For: (49) Councillors Allison, Aspinall, Bannerman, Mrs Beer, Blight, Briars-Delve, Coker, Creswell, Dann, Dingle, Evans OBE, Finn, Freeman, Gilmour, Goslin, Haydon, Hendy, Holloway, Laing, Lawson, Loveridge, Lowry, Lugger, McCarty, McLay, McNamara, Moore, Morton, Murphy, Ney, P. Nicholson, Noble, Penberthy, Penrose, Poyser, Raynsford, Reilly, Ricketts, Simpson, Smith, Sproston, Steel, Stephens, Stevens, Taylor, Tippetts, Tofan, Tuohy, Wood.

 

Against: (0)

 

Abstain: (1) Councillor S. Nicholson.

 

Did not vote/absent: (2) Councillors Cuddihee and Ms Watkin.

 

71.

Declarations of Interest

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

72.

Council Proportionality and Appointments to Committees, Outside Bodies etc

The Monitoring Officer will submit a review of proportionality and changes to appointments to committees, outside bodies etc following changes to political groups.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Lord Mayor introduced the report which was seconded by Depuy Lord Mayor. 

 

Council agreed to note the report.

73.

Questions by the Public pdf icon PDF 86 KB

To receive questions from and provide answers to the public in relation to matters which are about something the council is responsible for or something that directly affects people in the city, in accordance with Part B, paragraph 11 of the Constitution.

 

Questions, of no longer than 50 words, can be submitted to the Democratic Support Unit, Plymouth City Council, Ballard House, West Hoe Road, Plymouth, PL1 3BJ, or email to democraticsupport@plymouth.gov.uk. Any questions must be received at least five complete working days before the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Mr Gregg Black submitted the following Question to the Leader of the Council.

 

Q. After the recent storm and Dawlish sea wall collapse cutting off rail services, does the Leader support reopening the Exeter–Okehampton–Tavistock line, and pushing forward the Devon Metro, to improve resilience, connectivity, and long-term rail security for Plymouth and the wider region?

 

A. The storm events over the Winter and temporary disruption along the Dawlish coastal route, once again highlighted the vulnerability of the South West’s rail network to extreme weather. While I note that rail services were restored quickly, once conditions?stabilised, the incident reinforces the need for long-term resilience planning across the regions strategic transport corridors. 

 

The Council has consistently?recognised?that reliable rail connectivity is essential not only for the day-to-day movement of residents and visitors, but also for supporting economic growth,?productivity?and wider prosperity across Plymouth and the far?South West.  The Council supports continued development of the Devon Metro programme, including the reinstatement of regular commuter rail services between Plymouth and Tavistock as part of a package of measures creating a high quality, frequent ‘Metro’ style commuter routes connecting Plymouth, SE Cornwall and SW Devon.   

    

We continue to support the exploration of opportunities which reduce travel times between Plymouth, London and the rest of the UK in order to improve rail resilience and encourage investment in Plymouth. We need to make sure that Plymouth and the surrounding catchment remains an integral part of the mainline route, in order to support economic growth of this city and will promote options which secure this into the future. 

 

In summary, we support strategic measures that strengthen the reliability and resilience of the region’s commuter rail network, while?recognising that major rail reopening or capacity schemes can only?proceed?with substantial national resources and multiagency collaboration.? 

 

Mr Alan Ramage submitted the following question to Councillor Mark Lowry, Cabinet Member for Finance.

 

Q. A previous reply gave reputational risk as reason for not changing banks. Climate has exacerbated adverse weather. It is increasing and it will impact Britain. 2021-24 Barclays invested $99 billion in fossil fuel projects, Lloyds $8 billion. If Lloyds has capability, would PCC change to avoid longer term reputational risk?

 

A. As you say, when securing banking arrangements, the Council must consider technical capability, security, service stability and the ability to manage high volume transactions. These requirements, together with value for money considerations and operational risk, help ensure that decisions do not compromise the Council’s financial resilience or impose disproportionate costs on residents. 

 

The Council continues to monitor the performance, policies and transition plans of its banking partners. While reputational risk is an important factor, it must be balanced with the need for secure and resilient banking services. 

 

The figures you reference from the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) report form part of a wider national debate about the role of major banks in the energy transition. 

 

Financing counted by RAN relates not to expanding fossil?fuel extraction but  ...  view the full minutes text for item 73.

74.

Announcements

(a)        To receive announcements from the Lord Mayor, Chief Executive, Service Director for Finance or Head of Legal Services;

 

(b)        To receive announcements from the Leader, Cabinet Members or Committee Chairs.

Minutes:

Councillor Evans OBE (Leader of the Council) made the following announcements:

 

a)    A briefing note had been prepared on fuel and energy security, which would be circulated following the meeting;

 

b)    In respect of diesel, the Council received weekly deliveries, with storage levels continuously monitored with adequate supplies being held;

 

c)    Fuel costs were variable and subject to market fluctuation. Current and anticipated increases had been reflected within budget monitoring, which remained under constant review;

 

d)    The Council had already secured 100% of summer 2026 energy requirements, and no impact was anticipated from events in the Middle East;

 

e)    Approximately 40% of winter 2026 power had been purchased. Further purchasing was being deferred pending clarity on delivery timescales and the potential progression of the Chelson Meadows Community Solar Farm and associated Virtual Power Purchase Agreement;

 

f)     Officers were monitoring the market daily, noting mixed forecasts regarding short? and long?term price movements;

 

g)    In relation to heating oil, the Leader highlighted a Government announcement confirming over £50 million of support for households facing high costs;

 

h)    Funding would be distributed via the Household Support Fund, transitioning from 01 April 2026 into the Crisis and Resilience Fund;

 

i)     Councillors were asked to signpost eligible residents, particularly those on benefits experiencing exceptional heating costs, to the available support;

 

j)     The Leader confirmed that Plymouth City Council had not cancelled or sought to cancel its elections and expressed confidence in standing on the administration’s record;

 

k)    Achievements under the current Labour administration, included:

 

                      i.        inward investment and job creation;

                     ii.        expanded apprenticeships and training;

                    iii.        delivery of housing and public infrastructure;

                    iv.        investment in youth services, playgrounds, care leavers and SEND provision;

                     v.        improvements to the city centre, including reduced vacancy rates and increased footfall; and

                    vi.        improvements to core services, including street cleanliness, tree planting and pothole repairs.

 

l)     The Leader cited instability and governance issues in new Reform council’s, including resignations, expulsions and financial commitments not being delivered.

 

Councillor Haydon (Cabinet Member for Community Safety, Events, Libraries, Cemetries and Crematoria) provided the following updates:

 

m)  Plymouth would be launching a six?month pilot scheme offering free bus travel to survivors of domestic abuse, delivered in partnership with Plymouth Citybus, Stagecoach and Stagecoach South West, working alongside Plymouth City Council;

 

n)    It was reported that the scheme was a community?led initiative, delivered by First Light, the city’s specialist domestic abuse support service. The pilot would provide 53 individual 28?day bus tickets, designed to support survivors in accessing essential services, including:

 

                     i.         housing and homelessness appointments;

                    ii.        legal advice and court proceedings;

                   iii.         counselling and therapeutic support;

                   iv.         education, school attendance and employment; and

                    v.        other critical health and wellbeing services.

 

o)    The primary aim of the scheme was to remove transport as a barrier to safety, support independence and recovery, and strengthen Plymouth’s coordinated, city?wide response to domestic abuse;

 

p)    The pilot would be closely monitored, with a formal review planned between three and six months to assess  ...  view the full minutes text for item 74.

75.

Lord Mayoralty 2026/27 pdf icon PDF 151 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Dann presented the report which was seconded by Councillor Evans OBE. 

 

Following a contribution from Councillor Mrs Beer, Council agreed to:

 

1)    Approve the recommendation of the Lord Mayor Selection and Advisory Committee and agree to appoint Councillor Kevin Sproston as Lord Mayor for 2026/27.

 

For: (50) Councillors Allison, Aspinall, Bannerman, Mrs Beer, Blight, Briars-Delve, Coker, Cresswell, Dann, Dingle, Evans OBE, Finn, Freeman, Gilmour, Goslin, Haydon, Hendy, Holloway, Laing, Lawson, Loveridge, Lowry, Lugger, McCarty, McLay, McNamara, Moore Penrose, Morton, Murphy, Ney, P. Nicholson, S. Nicholson, Noble, Penberthy, Poyser, Raynsford, Reilly, Ricketts, Simpson, M. Smith, Sproston, Steel, Stephens, Stevens, Taylor, Tippetts, Tofan, Tuohy, and Wood.

 

Against: (0)

 

Abstain (0)

 

Absent/did not vote: (2) Councillors Cuddihee and Ms Watkin.

 

76.

Extension of designation of Section 151 Officer pdf icon PDF 173 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Lowry introduced the report which was seconded by Councillor Evans OBE.

 

Council agreed to:

 

1.    That Council extends the designation of the interim Service Director for Finance, David Northey, as the section 151 Officer for the Council.

 

For: (49) Councillors Allison, Aspinall, Bannerman, Mrs Beer, Blight, Briars?Delve, Coker, Cresswell, Dann, Dingle, Evans OBE, Finn, Freeman, Gilmour, Goslin, Haydon, Hendy, Holloway, Laing, Lawson, Loveridge, Lowry, Lugger, McCarty, McLay, McNamara, Moore, Morton, Murphy, Ney, Noble, P. Nicholson, S. Nicholson, Penberthy, Poyser, Raynsford, Reilly, Ricketts, Simpson, M. Smith, Sproston, Steel, Stephens, Stevens, Taylor, Tippetts, Tofan, Tuohy, and Wood.

 

Against: (0)

 

Abstain: (0)

 

Absent/ did not vote: (3) Councillors Cuddihee, Penrose, and Ms Watkin.

 

 

 

77.

Motions on notice

To consider motions from councillors in accordance with Part B, paragraph 14 of the Constitution.

78.

Future Provision of Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) in Plymouth pdf icon PDF 56 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Haydon introduced the motion which was seconded by Councillor Raynsford.

 

Following contributions from Councillors Reilly, Mrs Beer, Holloway, Taylor and Finn, Council agreed to:

 

1.    Request the Leader to write to NHS England, the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner, and relevant Government minister to reiterate the Council’s concerns about the proposed relocation and encourage collaborative exploration of alternative or hybrid models that keep forensic capacity in Plymouth.

 

For: (50) Councillors Allison, Aspinall, Bannerman, Mrs Beer, Blight, Briars?Delve, Coker, Cresswell, Dann, Dingle, Evans OBE, Finn, Freeman, Gilmour, Goslin, Haydon, Hendy, Holloway, Laing, Lawson, Loveridge, Lowry, Lugger, McCarty, McLay, McNamara, Moore, Morton, Murphy, Ney, Noble, P. Nicholson, S. Nicholson, Penberthy, Penrose, Poyser, Raynsford, Reilly, Ricketts, Simpson, M. Smith, Sproston, Steel, Stephens, Stevens, Taylor, Tippetts, Tofan, Tuohy, and Wood.

 

Against: (0)

 

Abstain: (0)

 

Absent/did not vote: (2) Councillors Cuddihee and Ms Watkin.

 

 

79.

In support of Royal British Legion's 'Keep the Covenant Promise' campaign pdf icon PDF 75 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Murphy introduced the motion which was seconded by Councillor Sproston.

 

Following contributions from Councillors Lugger, Penberthy, Council agreed to:

 

1.    Plymouth City Council resolves to ask the Leader to write to the Minister for Veterans and People, Louise Sandher-Jones MP, in support of The Royal British Legion’s ‘Keep the Covenant Promise’ campaign:

 

               i.        To call for improved statutory guidance and funding to all public bodies in scope of the extended Duty, including local authorities, to deliver better support through the expanded Covenant Duty.

 

              ii.        To ask that the UK Government implements a dedicated programme of promotional activity on the Armed Forces Covenant, in order to improve public awareness and positively recognise those who serve / have served in HM Armed Forces.

 

             iii.         To ensure that the impact of the expanded Covenant Duty is thoroughly monitored, and that members of the Armed Forces community can access effective means of redress in cases where the Duty is not fulfilled.

 

For: (49) Councillors Allison, Aspinall, Bannerman, Mrs Beer, Blight, Briars?Delve, Coker, Cresswell, Dann, Dingle, Evans OBE, Freeman, Gilmour, Goslin, Haydon, Hendy, Holloway, Laing, Lawson, Loveridge, Lowry, Lugger, McCarty, McLay, McNamara, Moore, Morton, Murphy, Ney, Noble, P. Nicholson, S. Nicholson, Penberthy, Penrose, Ricketts, Poyser, Raynsford, Reilly, Simpson, M. Smith, Sproston, Steel, Stephens, Stevens, Taylor, Tippetts, Tofan, Tuohy, and Wood.

 

Against: (0)

 

Abstain (0)

 

Absent/did not vote: (3) Councillors Cuddihee, Finn and Watkin.

 

 

(Following the conclusion of this item, Council adjourned until 4.10pm)

80.

Drake Ward by-election pdf icon PDF 55 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Steel introduced the motion which was seconded by Councillor Taylor. Following contributions from Councillors Holloway, Loveridge, Gilmour, Ricketts, Goslin, P. Nicholson, Bannerman, Dann, Ney, Stevens and McLay, Council agreed to:

 

1.    Invite Councillor Ricketts to resign to enable residents to determine their representation in line with the Council elections on 7 May 2026.

 

For: (35) Councillors Allison, Aspinall, Bannerman, Blight, Briars?Delve, Coker, Cresswell, Cuddihee, Dann, Dingle, Evans OBE, Gilmour, Goslin, Haydon, Hendy, Holloway, Laing, Lawson, Lowry, McCarty, McNamara, Moore, Morton, Murphy, Noble, Penberthy, Penrose, Raynsford, Simpson, M. Smith, Steel, Stephens, Stevens, Taylor, and Tuohy.

 

Against (4) Councillor Mrs Beer, Loveridge, Ney and Ricketts.

 

Abstain: (8) Councillors Finn, Lugger, McLay, P. Nicholson, Poyser, Reilly, Tippetts, and Wood.

 

Absent/did not vote: (5) Councillors Freeman, S. Nicholson, Sproston, Tofan, and Ms Watkin.

 

 

 

 

81.

City of Culture pdf icon PDF 60 KB

Minutes:

This motion was withdrawn by Councillor Wood.

82.

Safety of Fishers pdf icon PDF 61 KB

Minutes:

Councillor Evans OBE introduced the motion which was seconded by Councillor McCarty.

 

Following a contribution from Councillors Lugger, Council agreed to:

 

1.    Create an online survey for commercial and charter fishers who live in the City of Plymouth or who own and/or work on commercial and/or coded charter vessels that predominantly work out of Plymouth to express their interest;

 

2.    Develop a business case with quotes, that provides PFDs with PLBs to eligible fisher;

 

3.    Develop a business case with quotes for a project to support enhanced (not statutory) safety training tailored to each vessel and crew and create a report to be submitted to the Department of Transport’s Marine and Coastguard Agency with proposals for better, best practice where needed;

 

4.    Prepare and submit a bid to the Fisheries and Seafood Scheme when it opens later this spring to seek core funding for 80% of these project costs;

 

5.    Seek match funding of 20% from maritime, and marine charities for these project costs.

 

For: (44) Councillors Allison, Aspinall, Blight, Briars?Delve, Coker, Cuddihee, Dann, Dingle, Evans OBE, Finn, Gilmour, Goslin, Haydon, Hendy, Holloway, Laing, Lawson, Lowry, Lugger, McCarty, McLay, McNamara, Moore, Morton, Murphy, Noble, P. Nicholson, Penberthy, Penrose, Poyser, Raynsford, Reilly, Ricketts, Simpson, M. Smith, Sproston, Steel, Stephens, Stevens, Taylor, Tippetts, Tofan, Tuohy, and Wood.

 

Against: (0)

 

Abstain: (0)

 

Absent/did not vote: (8) Councillors Bannerman, Mrs Beer, Cresswell, Freeman, Loveridge, Ney, S. Nicholson, and Ms Watkin.

83.

Questions by Councillors

Questions to the Leader, Cabinet Members and Committee Chairs covering aspects for their areas of responsibility or concern by councillors in accordance with Part B, paragraph 12 of the constitution.

Minutes:

 

From

To

Subject

1

Cllr Wood

Cllr Stephens

Councillor Stevens, given that residents in Plymouth already pay multiple layers of taxation simply to own and operate a vehicle, which include VAT on vehicle purchases and maintenance, vehicle exercise duty, the DVLA registration fee, fuel duty, VAT on that same fuel, and the insurance premium tax, all of which are paid from post tax income.

 

How does Plymouth City Council justify introducing and increasing parking charges well above the rate of inflation? Given this further penalizes residents for parking in our car parks and on the roads that they have already paid to maintain through their council tax. Did the administration tell your backbench colleagues of your proposals before you asked them to vote through your budget last month? 

 

Response: Each year the council carefully reviews the budget, including annual parking reviews. Previous administrations also increased parking charges significantly, including a large rise of around 30% in a short period. The council must operate a parking service that prioritises safety, particularly around schools, where enforcement is needed to protect children and families from inconsiderate parking. Effective enforcement requires staff, site visits, and tools such as cameras, and without appropriate fees this would not be possible. Parking enforcement is not aimed at considerate drivers but at those whose selfish behaviour puts others at risk.

Following public feedback, the council amended its proposals by withdrawing the planned escalation charges for multi?car households with permits. Councillors from all parties have worked together on-site to assess safety issues around schools, bus stops, shelters and pinch points, and this is where charges have been increased. Overall, the changes are intended to ensure fair and consistent parking services and to support broader transport and highways maintenance across the city.

Supplementary: Under the Conservative administration, council tax, council debt and parking charges were lower. Your proposals would increase parking at Plymouth Hoe by 35% to £2.50 an hour, raise long?stay business permits by 30% to £617.50, and increase the cost of applying for a disabled bay to £55.90. How do you justify raising taxes, fees and charges well above inflation during a cost?of?living crisis, and how does this help residents or businesses?

 

Response: We did put them above inflation to meet actual cost. We've allowed choice in the parking proposals. For example, if somebody buys a parking ticket in the city center, if they haven't used up the whole time that they paid for, they're at liberty of moving to another car park in the city center to use the remaining time. That's what I call value for money.

Charges are being introduced for parking along the promenade, including the blue badge parking areas, as this space is not classified as on?road parking and has been used by some drivers as a commuter car park. The changes were necessary to ensure fairness and consistency in parking provision.

 

The increased charges reflected the rising costs of operating the parking service, including staff recruitment and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 83.