Agenda item
BSIP (Bus Service Improvement Plan) 2023
Minutes:
Councillor Mark Coker (Cabinet Member for Strategic Planning and Infrastructure) introduced the Bus Service Improvement Plan (BSIP) 2023 and highlighted the following points:
a)
If Plymouth was to reach its climate emergency ambitions, the bus
would need to not only be a tool of inclusion, but the transport
choice moving forward;
b)
A BSIP was a requirement following the 2021 National Bus
Strategy;
c)
The BSIP set out what was required to make buses easier cheaper and
better and more convenient;
d)
It was submitted in September 2021, but failed to attract funding
along with 61% of other authorities, however, it remained the
bidding document for this and future rounds of funding, so needed
to be refreshed;
e)
Constructive feedback was provided by the Department for Transport
and the team had used this to develop and refresh the
BSIP;
f)
He had welcomed representatives from the Department for Transport
in Summer 2023, and they had been impressed with many aspects of
public transport in the city;
g)
The visit had been a reminder that Plymouth was well-placed to
‘deliver bus back better’, the aim of the 2023
BSIP;
h)
Improvements needed to be made in what remained highly challenging
financial circumstances, and passengers and the bus industry were
working with Plymouth City Council to identify
improvements;
i)
The vision was to create a thriving bus network to connect people
to important places with services that were frequent, reliable,
fast, affordable, safe and clean;
j)
The vision was underpinned by nine passenger priorities focused on
frequency, reliability, journey speed, affordability, safety,
cleanliness, making buses simple, better connected, accessible and
modern;
k)
The team were engaging with bus users on ranking these priorities
to ensure the plan reflected the needs of current and potential
users;
l) The BSIP was a clear, evidence-based rationale for improvement of Plymouth’s bus services, that made the city well-placed to receive future rounds of government funding.
Supported by Rosemary Starr (Sustainable Transport Manager) added:
m)
A statutory partnership had been established and had come into
effect on 1 April 2023, which would be the instrument for the
delivery of the BSIP, should funding be secured, as required by the
National Bus Strategy of 2021;
n)
The 2021 National Bus Strategy had been the first of its kind and
aimed to restore public transport, increase use and it also
included 12 themes which the BSIP responded to;
o)
The BSIP had also been designed to deliver against two strategic
priorities within the Plymouth Plan: To deliver a safe and
accessible and health-enabling transport system, and using
transport to grow the economy;
p) The BSIP had 3 strategic outcomes:
i. Supporting the local economy and facilitating economic development;
ii. Delivering wider social and health benefits;
iii.
Enabling reduction of carbon emissions and improving air
quality;
q)
The vision of the BSIP was “to create a thriving bus network
where everyone can be connected to important people and places, by
services that were frequent, reliable, fast, affordable, safe and
clean, which would help Plymouth achieve its net zero goals by
2030;
r)
The priorities were out for consultation with a variety of groups
to ensure they were correct and ranked correctly;
s)
The BSIP included a proposal to set up a bus user panel to engage
with people on a regular basis regarding both what they would like
to see improved, and as a group with which to test proposals before
implementation;
t)
1,670 responses had been received at that point for the BSIP
Passenger Priority Survey and the top three priorities were
frequent, reliable, fast and affordable;
u)
Six core corridors had been identified across the city and the
improvements would be undertaken along these corridors in order for
the investment to have maximum impact;
v)
Detailed the strengths and weaknesses of each of the priorities as
detailed in the background paper uploaded for this item;
w) The targets for the plan were in two sets, one for 2030 to meet Plymouth’s Net Zero target, and one for 2034 to tie in with the Plymouth Plan, these were also set out in more detail in the background papers.
In response to
questions it was further
explained:
x)
Buses needed to be able to get through traffic, but designs would
not intend on holding up traffic;
y)
Passenger growth targets were ambitious but it was important to be
ambitious following feedback from the Department for
Transport;
z)
People that were 19 years of age had been
identified as an appropriate age to increase child fares to.
This would ensure it was the same across providers, and whilst
there had not been proposals to increase the age further, there had
been discussions around the provision of a skipper ticket that
would work across providers to make travel more competitive in
terms of cost;
aa)
They would take the suggestion that bus providers undertook
bystander training to help make women feel more safe in using
public transport at night, to the enhanced partnership;
bb) There were plans to introduce a park and ride
location close to Sherford, once a
certain number of houses had been completed there and was supported
by Plymouth City Council, Devon County Council and South Hams
Council;
cc)
The Bus User Panel was still being developed and the team were
going to be in a meeting the following week to discuss best
practice across the country to make the panel the best it could
be;
dd) Traffic on the roads was expected to
increase, and so the target of keeping bus journey times the same
as they were was ambitious;
ee) The team would take the feedback for
consideration that an orbital route in Plympton/Plymstock
would be beneficial;
ff)
The measures within the BSIP were gender neutral;
gg)
Plymotion feedback would include
information on the barriers people faced in using buses and the
team could look to see if there was a trend amongst men, choosing
to use their car rather than the bus;
hh) It was important to encourage the older
generations to use the buses, whose usage of public transport had
declined since the COVID19 pandemic, not just to encourage public
transport use for environmental reasons, but also to improve mental
and physical health;
ii)
Feedback from areas where bus shelters had been removed would be
considered to determine if some could be replaced;
jj)
The team were working with employers to encourage change in the way
people travel to work and the dockyard had introduced discounts for
bus users, and bus services had been put on for match days for
Plymouth Argyle;
kk) It was important to work with schools as
children could be very influential on modes of transport used by
parents;
ll)
Clear communication was essential to encourage people to use buses,
including the real time information, as well as timetable and
ticketing information;
mm)
Bus operators had joined the national neighbourhood watch campaign
for community safety and the
enhanced partnership would continue this work;
nn)
The team were looking at other funding options available to make
the bus networks greener;
oo)
The Peninsula Transport Board was working on a strategy for the
west country and park and rides would be looked at within this, and
the need for one in Cornwall to allow people to park and ride into
Plymouth would be encouraged by Plymouth City Council;
pp) Councillor Coker was happy to look into the possibility of care experienced young people getting a discount on buses with the providers.
The Committee agreed to:
1.
Endorse the draft of the 2023 Plymouth Bus Service Improvement Plan
(BSIP);
2.
Endorse the nine passenger priorities set out within the BSIP 2023
as the drivers behind the improvements that the BSIP sought to
deliver;
3. Endorse the measures set out within the BSIP as key interventions, which supported the policies of the Plymouth Plan and, on delivery, would help deliver the identified passenger priorities.
Supporting documents:
- 230829 Growth and Infrastructure OSC BSIP 0.4 - Cover Sheet, item 14. PDF 194 KB
- 230816 - 2023 BSIP EIA, item 14. PDF 195 KB
- 230816 BSIP Growth and Infrastructure OSC Briefing Report, item 14. PDF 719 KB
- 230810 Plymouth BSIP refresh - DRAFT for Scrutiny, item 14. PDF 11 MB
- 230912 BSIP G&I OSC Presentation Final, item 14. PDF 2 MB