Agenda item
Adult Social Care - Improvement Journey
Minutes:
Councillor Aspinall (Cabinet Member for Health and Adult Social Care) introduced the item and highlighted the following points:
a)
Since April 2024, Adult Social Care had worked with
over 13,000 people through assuring people’s physical and
mental health, providing day services and making sure people were
kept safe through safeguarding processes;
b) PCC aimed to support people who cared for others including social workers, occupational therapists and, paid staff members in care homes or supported living.
Gary
Walbridge (Strategic Director for Adults, Health and Communities)
added:
c)
The Care Quality Commission (CWC) started their
inspection of PCC’s Adult Social Care in September
2023;
d)
The first approach was to undertake a
self-assessment against the CQC framework to help PCC understand
where they excelled and needed to make improvements. An improvement
plan was made from this procedure;
e)
Partners from the Local Government Association (LGA)
would give PCC a peer review on their improvement plan;
f)
One of the Care Act duties was promoting the
integration of care and support with health services and in 2015
PCC integrated all its assessment functions with Livewell Southwest;
g) Plymouth was second best in the Southwest for discharge performance.
Stephen Beet (Head of Adult Social Care and Retained Functions) added:
h)
The CQC were halfway through reviewing every Local
Authority Adult Social Care department in the country;
i)
The LGA undertook the peer review in January 2025
where PCC shared 300 documents in advance and included 10 case file
audits and 40 meetings with 180 members of staff;
Michelle Thomas (Livewell Southwest) added:
j)
The LGA highlighted how passionate and positive
staff were about supporting the people of Plymouth, and how good
staff retention rates were;
k)
PCC were exploring available regional data to
support benchmarking conversations;
l)
Livewell
were focussing on integration and closer
collaboration with well-being hubs, primary care family hubs and
delivering whole family offers across all services;
m)
All Livewell staff had
access to Care Act training;
n) Livewell and PCC senior managers regularly attended joint briefings as a commitment to communicating their joint development visions.
Geoff
Baines (Deputy Chief Executive, Livewell Southwest) added:
o)
Areas of feedback from the CQC inspection included
social work practice, equality and diversity recording and waiting
times;
p)
Livewell
had been delivering health services to asylum
seekers through an asylum seeker service;
q)
A Waiting Well policy had been introduced to give
people on the waiting list good information about other support
services available in the interim;
r) There had been a 50% reduction in those waiting to be seen within the last 12 months.
Emma Crowther (Service Director for
Integrated Commissioning) added:
s)
The CQC peer reviewers met with PCC’s
commissioning providers for care homes and supported living and
agreed there was mutual respect and a good, trusting, open
relationship;
t)
Gaps in services included specialist care provision
with people with complex challenges, and more choices for short
breaks and rest bite for people who are caring and cared
for;
u)
The Multi-Agency Safeguarding Partnership was
recognised;
v)
The message from the peer review what PCC could do
more to work with partners more closely;
w)
More clarity was needed on the Adult Social Care
vision and strategy to ensure the workforce understood and engaged
with processes;
x)
There needed to be more visible leadership and
communication through every level of both organisations to ensure
frontline social care teams were involved in improvement
plans;
y) There was a priority around occupational therapy and ensuring the work occupational therapists do was visible and well understood.
Andy
Williams (Organisational Lead for Adult Social Care, Livewell Southwest) added:
z)
Governance systems were put in place to ensure Adult
Social Care was being delivered by Livewell Southwest, with the responsibility sitting
with the Local Authority, in the right way;
aa)
Although there were no statutory time frames to
measure performance, Livewell Southwest
were using 28 days as a benchmark which was the gold
standard;
bb)The benchmark for reviews was 12 months even though there was not a statutory time frame for this.
Councillor Aspinall (Cabinet Member for Health and Adult Social
Care) added:
cc)
The information provided was discussed at the Health
and Adult Social Care Scrutiny Committee;
dd)Recommended the Action Plan be brought back to Cabinet.
In response to questions, it was explained:
ee) Learning had been taken from
children’s experiences and services, and other
partners;
ff) There would be a social care therapist and physio at Foulston Park.
Cabinet agreed:
1.
To note the content of the report;
2. To bring the Action Plan back to the next Cabinet Meeting.
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure
-
Committee Report Template ASC March 2024 (1), item 128.
PDF 155 KB -
ASC Improvement V5, item 128.
PDF 707 KB -
Self Assessment V7 - January 2025 (1), item 128.
PDF 1 MB
