Agenda item
Productive Growth and High Value Jobs Update (Economic Strategy Pillar 1)
- Meeting of Natural Infrastructure and Growth Scrutiny Panel, Wednesday 9 July 2025 2.00 pm (Item 6.)
Minutes:
Councillor Evans OBE
(Leader of the Council) introduce the report, supported
byJulia Blaschke (Economic Development Manager -
Partners), Richard Davies (Vice Chancellor, University of
Plymouth), David Draffan (Service Director, Economic Development),
Lauren Paton (Economic Development Officer) and Nina Sarlaka
(Inward Investment and Enterprise Manager, Economic
Development):
a)
The intention was to bring each
of the five pillars of the economic strategy, one to each meeting
of the Panel in 2025/26;
b)
This pillar focused on
increasing productivity and wages to enhance prosperity;
c)
Plymouth was well positioned as
a national opportunity with significant investment
potential;
d)
£4.4 billion investment
in the dockyard was expected to create 5,500 jobs;
e)
£3 billion investment in
Derriford Hospital;
f)
The city centre had a £1
billion pipeline of regeneration projects;
g)
A Growth Alliance had been
formed between the Council, Royal Navy, and Babcock which aimed to
support innovation, creation of high value jobs, skills, and
housing development;
h)
Plymouth had been
designated the UK’s National Centre for Marine Autonomy which
showed the excellence of the companies who had already been
attracted into in Plymouth, but opened up even more opportunity for
the future;
i)
Homes England had partnered
with the Council to build 10,000 homes, mostly in the city centre
to create an exemplar of urban living;
j)
The industrial strategy had
recognised Plymouth’s marine and defence
capabilities;
k)
Babcock had announced a defence
dividend for Plymouth which planned to relocate 2,000 workers to
the city centre, an integrated logistics and manufacturing facility
was proposed in the Freeport, and a new centre for engineering
nuclear skills;
l)
The city had a £10
billion investment pipeline, a strong business community, three
universities, a highly skilled workforce, a Freeport and a science
park;
m)
Universities played a key role
in innovation and workforce development;
n)
The University of Plymouth
(UoP) had held meetings with various representatives of governments
from around the world due to interest in Plymouth’s marine
and defence sectors;
o)
UoP had led initiatives in
cybersecurity and marine technology;
p)
Medical research and business
incubation were supported by UoP facilities;
q)
Knowledge partnerships placed
students in businesses to foster innovation;
r)
Skills development targeted
both young and mature learners;
s)
An innovation task force had
been established to coordinate efforts;
t)
16 strategic projects were
identified across investible themes: Defence sector and Devonport,
the waterfront and maritime, the north of the city and the city
centre;
i.
These projects were not
necessarily owned, funded or held by the Council;
ii.
They would all significantly
impact on high value jobs and productive growth;
iii.
Projects included building
Oceansgate Innovative Barns, Growing Smart Sound Plymouth and
strengthening supply chains for University Hospitals Plymouth NHS
Trust;
u) Scrutiny Panel members were encouraged to visit www.investplymouth.co.uk to learn more.
In response to
questions, the following was discussed:
v)
£50 million was needed to
reopen a railway line to Tavistock and open a train station in
Plympton, which The Leader was lobbying for in connection with the
defence investment in Plymouth;
w)
Electric buses had recently
launched in the city;
x)
There was consultation and
discussions ongoing about improvements at Manadon interchange, and
other congestion-busting road network areas;
y)
The Council were working with
Babcock on green staff travel plans;
z)
There were plans to expand The
George Park and Ride;
aa)
Approximately 30,000 people
were of working age but were not working and part of the strategy
was to get 6,000-10,000 of those people reskilled and into the
workforce;
bb)There was a
need to encourage more graduates to remain in the city;
cc)
Another part of the strategy
was to increase the aspirations of Plymouth’s population
going through the education system;
dd)Marketing
Plymouth was important to get people to relocate to the
city;
ee)The pace of
the change in vacancies within specialist areas, increase in number
of apprenticeships in the dockyard;
ff)
It could be argued that people
had not previously seen the ability to build a long-term career,
across multiple large employers in Plymouth before, but recent and
future investment was changing this;
gg)
There were barriers for
diversity in some industries, particularly for women, and it was
important to create role models, work which was being done through
the university;
hh)UoP offered
hands-on experiences different to other universities across the
country in a variety of courses;
ii)
There was a need to engage with
young people in Plymouth and use mentor and ambassador schemes to
do so;
jj)
Leaders within the city were
aligned on the vision for the future;
kk)UoP wanted to be a strong civic contributor and recognised that partnership working led to more positive impact and better solutions.
The Panel agreed to:
1. Note the report and the continued focus on Productive Growth and High Value Jobs, as a key element of the Plymouth Economic Strategy.
Supporting documents:
-
Productive Growth and High Value Jobs Scrutiny Cover 9.7.2025, item 6.
PDF 157 KB -
Final Productive Growth and High Value Jobs Update Report 9.7.2025, item 6.
PDF 436 KB -
PG and HVJ Pillar Update Scrutiny 9.7.2025 Final (002), item 6.
PDF 380 KB
