Agenda item
Sustainable Growth (Economic Strategy Pillar 3)
Minutes:
Councillor Briars-Delve (Cabinet Member for Environment and Climate Change), supported by Amanda Ratsey (Head of Economy & Investment) and Richard Stevens (Managing Director, Plymouth Citybus), introduced the item and highlighted:
a)
Sustainable growth was generally considered as growth that did not
negatively impact the environment, but promoted social inclusion
and wellbeing and helped to drive a green industrial economic
revolution;
b)
When considering economic growth, it was important to increase the
green and blue skills within the city and consider decarbonisation,
waste reduction, boosting nature recovery;
c)
To deliver economic growth, six elements had been identified
through which resources would flow:
i.
Attracting new investment into the city in green jobs, specifically
around new and emerging energy production and storage;
ii.
Business support, helping businesses adapt to climate change and
move to net zero emission;
iii.
Decarbonise the current economy, including retrofitting the
existing commercial building stock and opportunities;
iv.
Restorative actions which improved sustainability;
v.
Commitment to supporting sustainable travel and living, including
public transport provision;
vi.
Skills and Workforce Development needs for a more sustainable
economy;
d)
Plymouth had secured funding from central government for electric
buses, receiving the largest award nationally and committing to a
£20 million investment;
i.
Electric buses were operational, quieter and cleaner but still
faced traffic and capacity challenges;
ii.
The Citybus depot in Milehouse was a Net Zero facility;
iii.
If the funding was available, the depot was in a position to be
able to run an entirely decarbonised fleet of buses;
iv. Plymouth was at the leading edge of the decarbonisation of public transport;
e) Floating offshore wind development through the Celtic Array Crown Estate project included the potential for 7000 new jobs in the South West;
f) Focus areas included marine autonomy, cybersecurity, surveying and training for high value roles;
g) Port infrastructure investment included installation of shore power with £5 million investment supported by freeport funding, enhancing connectivity through Brittany Ferries to France and Spain;
h) Plymouth was announced as the National Centre for Marine Autonomy, attracting businesses working on clean propulsion technologies such as hydrogen, hybrid battery systems and sail drive;
i) Links to Freeport hydrogen power development was highlighted as important for inward investment;
j) Sustainability priorities included investment in green jobs aligned with the corporate plan, supporting businesses to adapt to climate change, restoring the natural environment through initiatives like the National Marine Park and Community Forest, promoting clean transport and sustainable living, and developing skills for young people and career movers transitioning to clean technologies;
k) Next steps included quarterly pillar meetings to strengthen the evidence base, commissioning further research on emerging opportunities such as battery technology, continuing monitoring of economic strategy progress using Power BI with a 75% response rate in the first round, and reviewing workstreams to reflect rapid innovation in sectors like marine autonomy and alternative propulsion.
In response to questions, supported by David Draffan (Service Director for Economic Development), Mike Page (Growth Board and Funding Manager), Lauren Paton (Economic Development Officer), the following was discussed:
l)
The cost of an electric bus was approximately double that of a
diesel bus for the initial purchase, with a Euro 6 diesel bus
costing around £286,000 and an electric bus just under
£500,000;
i.
Lifetime costs for electric buses were higher due to battery
replacements every three to five years, typically closer to three
years, at about £30,000 each, adding around £150,000
over the vehicle’s life;
ii.
Running costs were lower for electric buses because they have fewer
parts, less wear and tear, reduced maintenance cycles, and no oil
usage;
iii.
Fuel costs had improved for electric buses as energy prices have
fallen, giving a slight cost advantage per mile, though it was
still too early to confirm if overall lifetime costs would be
lower;
iv.
The Council did not invest over £30 million in the buses; its
contribution was £750,000 from the Community Infrastructure
Levy funds, which helped unlock over £30 million of external
investment from the bus company and national government;
v. The project was considered essential for improving air quality, introducing modern buses, and supporting sustainability goals;
vi. The monitoring of air quality had been ongoing. Monitoring occurred at locations along busy transport routes such as Royal Parade, Mutley Plain and Devonport Road, which previously had high pollutant levels due to heavy traffic and diesel buses;
vii.
Over multiple years, the city had shown sustained improvement, and
in 2025 the Air Quality Management Area designation was revoked as
levels consistently fell below thresholds. While this improvement
was not solely due to the electric fleet, it reflected overall
progress;
viii.
An air quality strategy was in place, and published data was
available through Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs (DEFRA) and the Environment Agency;
ix. All 50 electric buses were currently in service, and an additional nine buses would be introduced by April through extra funding from the Department for Transport, bringing the total to 59;
x. No buses had had to stop due to charging issues. Battery management ensured a lower limit of 10%, providing around 21 miles of range based on an average of 210 miles per charge. Buses were successfully operating across the Torpoint Ferry, marking the first electric vehicles to do so;
xi.
Electric buses did not carry petrol or diesel as backup power. They
ran entirely on battery technology, taking about seven hours for a
full charge and 40 minutes to reach 80%, making incidental charging
part of scheduling;
xii.
Additional benefits included improved acceleration and
deceleration, positive driver feedback, and the inclusion of two
wheelchair spaces per double-decker bus for the first time in the
city, enabled by better layout and space utilisation;
xiii.
Plans were being explored to offer charging facilities to other
organisations when not in use;
m)
A large conference had been held in Summer 2025 with around 120
businesses to showcase opportunities;
i.
Floating offshore wind was still in its early stages, with an
estimated lead time of eight to 10 years before full
implementation, which was why defence projects were the subject of
more communication at the time, however, there was definite
interest and opportunity in offshore wind;
ii.
Applying autonomy in hydrography surveying could speed up
consenting periods by up to two years, as autonomous systems could
operate continuously and reduce risks to personnel;
iii.
There were still regulatory and consenting challenges, but the
Ministry of Defence (MOD) was keen to collaborate with private
sector investment to accelerate innovation. Both sectors shared the
same level of energy and ambition, but offshore wind operated on a
longer timeframe compared to defence;
n)
The economic strategy had 55 live projects, of which 22 fell under
Team Plymouth. Team Plymouth accelerated areas of the economy,
particularly those linked to defence, but other projects such as
the heat network represented significant green investment
opportunities outside of Team Plymouth;
i.
The heat network was a £400 million project that would create
hundreds of green jobs and support small businesses. Team Plymouth
was important, but it was not the only focus for economic
growth;
ii.
Defining green jobs could be challenging, but the UK Office for
National Statistics provided a standardised definition using
industry codes. In 2023, 46% of UK full-time jobs were classified
as green jobs, and Plymouth performs well with 45 percent of
full-time employees in low-emitting industries;
o)
Monitoring currently focused on progress rather than impact, and
data analysis would become more central as the pillar developed.
The economic strategy included 12 long-term aspirations and would
undergo annual reviews, with a full review every three
years;
p)
The change of pace meant some opportunities, such as electric
buses, were not included initially and would need to be considered
in future updates;
q)
Sustainable growth was not only about specific job roles but also
about how businesses and residents operated sustainably. A job may
not be classed as sustainable, but if it existed within a
sustainable business model, it contributed. For example, electric
buses represented sustainable transport, only if the wider
environment and infrastructure supported them;
r)
The focus was on creating systems and practices that enabled
sustainability rather than isolated actions;
s)
There were several ways to link sustainability to the proposed city
centre growth of 10,000 homes. The city had significant housing
targets to meet, and concentrating housing growth in the city
centre provided sustainability benefits. For example, it reduced
pressure on suburban green spaces by delivering homes on existing
brownfield sites;
i.
From a decarbonisation perspective, more people living in the city
centre would have access to bus routes, bike stands, and businesses
within walking distance, reducing the need for car
ownership;
ii.
Another key aspect was heat network connectivity, which was already
planned for developments such as Millbay and the new version of
Millbay Way. These properties would be ready to connect to the most
affordable low carbon heating solution in the city, the heat
network;
iii.
As businesses changed in the city centre, there would be continued
efforts to encourage sustainable practices, and this would remain
central to planning for city centre growth;
t)
It was not possible to fully contextualise the spillover from
defence spending into the commercial space. However, there were
clear signs of investment growth;
u)
Some businesses were focused on marine autonomy and defence, while
others were working in hydrography and surveying, but also
exploring defence opportunities;
v)
The mix of businesses demonstrated rapid development and
innovation;
w)
The global value of marine autonomy was projected to be £103
billion, and Plymouth was one of three places in the world
operating at this cutting edge;
x)
Attracting high-value jobs and businesses to Plymouth would help
escalate behaviour change towards green and blue values. The
city’s brand strategy emphasised sustainability, not only
through its natural assets such the National Marine Park and
Dartmoor but also by promoting Plymouth as a network passionate
about the environment. This approach would attract people with the
values and education needed for sustainable growth and create
opportunities for new networks and wider behaviour
change;
y)
The business community was eager to adapt and provide services and
products to defence companies and organisations. The challenge was
aligning language and expectations between sectors to create
solutions quickly. The emerging frontier required agility, and the
business community believes there would be significant spillover
into sustainable areas;
z) Historical examples showed how defence technology had transitioned into civilian applications, such as ball bearings and hydraulic pipes originally developed for nuclear engineering now used in Formula One and aerospace;
i.
Defence procurement was also changing, moving from long-term
projects to rapid innovation cycles, creating opportunities for
small, agile businesses. These innovations were expected to flow
into civilian sectors like transport and energy storage over
time;
aa)
Plymouth was preparing to support innovation and growth by
integrating artificial intelligence into data analysis and
monitoring to respond quickly to opportunities;
bb) Local government
provided the platform for academia and business to
collaborate;
cc)
The city aimed to act as a petri dish for innovation, enabling
private sector growth and ensuring Plymouth remained at the
forefront of technological and sustainable development;
dd) Retrofitting
offered many opportunities economically, for health, and for
reducing energy bills. The Net Zero team were involved in a range
of programmes including retrofitting the Council’s corporate
and commercial estate, introducing fabric-first heat retention
approaches, and installing heat pumps to transition away from gas
boilers;
i.
Several million pounds of improvements had been delivered through
social housing decarbonisation funds in partnership with Plymouth
Community Homes and Livewell;
ii.
Additional investment had been announced for the Warm Homes Local
Grant;
iii.
The Council worked closely with Plymouth Energy Community to
provide energy advice and support, including door-to-door
engagement to increase uptake of grants such as the Homes Upgrade
Grant, which offered up to £20,000 per home for retrofitting.
These efforts were essential to the programme and would continue to
be prioritised;
ee) The single red rating noted in the report reflected progress rather than performance. It likely indicated that the project had not started yet, which the monitoring system captured in its assessment, more information would be provided ACTION;
ff)
Officers would share an updated project list and findings
following initial monitoring ACTION;
gg) Officers would share updated statistics on air quality monitoring ACTION.
The Panel agreed to;
- Note the report and the continued focus on Sustainable Growth as a key element of the Plymouth Economic Strategy.
Supporting documents:
-
Committee Report front page, item 28.
PDF 171 KB -
PES SG Scrutiny Paper Final, item 28.
PDF 243 KB -
PES SG Pillar Update Scrutiny 03 12 2025 FINAL, item 28.
PDF 253 KB
