Agenda item
LOCALISM ACT
- Meeting of Growth and Prosperity Overview and Scrutiny Panel, Monday 5 March 2012 3.00 pm (Item 76.)
The panel will be provided with a further update on the Localism Act.
Minutes:
Paul Barnard, Assistant Director for Planning Services, provided the panel with an update on the Localism Act.
The panel was informed that –
(a) |
the Localism Act received Royal Assent on 15 November 2011;
|
(b) |
the Act consists of the following sections:
|
(c) |
in terms of part I ‘Local Government’ the general power of competence has been introduced sooner than anticipated;
|
(d) |
there were provisions for council’s to choose which method of governance it wished to adopt; either executive, committee system or prescribed arrangements;
|
(e) |
the Standards Board for England had been abolished;
|
(f) |
there were new requirements for codes of practice of which the seven Nolan principles of public life were embedded;
|
(g) |
with regards to part 2 ‘EU Financial Sanctions’ Power for Central Government to pass on EU fines and other sanctions to local government (S48).
|
(h) |
Part 4 ‘Non Domestic Rates’ allowed for greater flexibility to local authorities to grant discretionary relief from business rates where reasonable to do so; this was coming into force April 2012;
|
(i) |
Part 5 ‘Community Empowerment’ allowed for provisions such as council tax referendums, community right to challenge, lists of assets of community value and land of community value; all provisions to come into force in April 2012;
|
(j) |
the demise of the Regional Spatial Strategy would have a minimal impact on Plymouth as the Council’s Core Strategy promoted high level of growth;
|
(k) |
a new Neighbourhood Planning regime has been created and that this would involve the need for Neighbourhood Forums to be created;
|
(l) |
local communities would have a greater say on local developments;
|
(m) |
Section 143 – financial considerations are now a material planning consideration; this enabled Planning Committee to ask what was the New Homes Bonus of the project and what is the likely Community Infrastructure Levy?
|
(n) |
there was to be a major reform of the housing allocation policy; |
In response to questions raised it was reported that –
(o) |
Ward Councillors would have the opportunity to play a more proactive role in the planning application process;
|
(p) |
specific powers were introduced 2007?? Is this date correct? Needs checking to allow council’s to impose fines with regards to rubbish collection; that power has been revoked. The power to charge for non-compliance with domestic waste recycling and refuse disposal has been repealed;
|
(q) |
the panel would be provided with a copy of the community information pack when it was ready to be circulated to local community groups;
|
(r) |
the Planning Committee had the opportunity to take into consideration how much weight financial issues should apply to each application; the Assistant Director for Planning Services agreed to provide this response in writing to the panel;
|
(s) |
Council’s were able to go to court if they could demonstrate deliberate concealment of development;
|
(t) |
the Planning Committee was currently able to consider the density of development and efficient use of urban land;
|
(u) |
the responsibility for lists of community value was yet to be established;
|
(v) |
due to changes brought about by the Localism Act Planning Services needed to be reconfigured to meet new customer needs; a restructure of the service would take place shortly; |
The Chair thanked Paul Barnard for his informative presentation.
Agreed that –
1. |
the Localism Act presentation would be emailed to panel members;
|
2. |
the information for community groups would be provided to panel members when available;
|
3. |
the Assistant Director for Planning Services agreed to provide the panel with a written response outlining the ability of the Planning Committee to take into consideration financial issues when considering applications. |