Agenda item

SCRUTINY ABSENCE REPORT

The Co-operative Scrutiny Board will receive the Scrutiny Absence Report for its consideration.

Minutes:

The Deputy Leader (Councillor Smith), the Strategic Director for Transformation and Change (Lesa Annear), the Interim Assistant Director for HR and OD (Marion Fanthorpe) and the Head of HR (Jane Stephenson) presented the scrutiny absence report which highlighted the following key areas –

 

(a)

employee absence was actively monitored and interventions were in place to support managers in the prevention of days lost due to sickness, with an emphasis on stress related absence;

 

 

(b)

the impact of sickness on the available working days during the last 12 months was 3.41%;

 

 

(c)

 

the overall target for the Council was an average of 8.49 full time equivalent (FTE) days; the actual average per FTE days lost to sickness was 8.05 FTE days;

 

 

(d)

 

the average days lost in the public sector (local authorities) for sickness absence was 8.7 FTE days; the authority had set a target below the average and proactively managed employee wellbeing initiatives Council wide;

 

 

(e)

the leading causes of sickness were reported to be stress, depression, psychological followed by musculoskeletal problems;

 

 

(f)

the Council actively managed staff who were off work due to sickness on a day to day basis through its capability policy and procedures; this included Return to Work interviews and Wellbeing meetings;

 

 

(g)

sickness absence data was regularly reviewed by managers and Assistant Directors on a monthly basis;  HR Advisors also reviewed the top 100 cases each month directly with the relevant line manager to ensure the appropriate action was being taken;

 

 

(h)

Council employees had access to an Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) which provided guidance on managing work and non-work related stressors through access to a 24/7 helpline and a signposting website as well as up to six free counselling sessions;

 

 

(i)

the Council encouraged the use of Occupational Health services wherever relevant; a total of 462 referrals were made to the service in 2014/15.

 

In response to questions raised by the Board, it was reported that –

 

(j)

there had been no impact on the sickness figures due to staff being transferred out of the authority in the short term;

 

 

(k)

a new on line system had been introduced (iTrent) whereby managers were able to log more accurately staff sickness absence and the causes of sickness;

 

 

(l)

the cost of sickness in 2013/14 was £290,000; this figure covered additional staff resources that had been required to fill posts whilst members of staff were sick; however, the vast majority of work was undertaken by existing members of staff;

 

 

(m)

benchmarking information relating to the private sector was not currently available (there was benchmarking information available for local authorities);

 

 

(n)

the purpose of the managing attendance (long term sickness) policy was to promote the wellbeing of employees, ensure a safe working environment and recognise the need for clear, fair and consistent procedures; the policy also clearly sets out the steps to be followed in this process;

 

 

(o)

absences which were less than four weeks were classed as short term, absences greater than four weeks were long term;

 

 

(p)

an employee was entitled to six months full sick pay in a rolling 12 months;

 

 

(q)

the decision to appoint agency staff was either taken at manager level or higher; the use of agency staff was less expensive compared to employing a permanent member of staff, as there were no on costs to budget for;

 

 

(r)

stress was defined as consistently high levels of pressure which could lead to depression or mental health issues; it was difficult to distinguish between work related stress and stress caused outside of the work place;

 

 

(s)

the Council had in place a stress and resilience policy that formed part of the health and safety standard which each department, service unit, school and team was expected to achieve, monitor and audit;

 

 

(t)

an undertaking was given to provide information on the top 10 known reasons for short term absences;

 

 

(u)

an undertaking was given to provide data on sickness absence within maintained schools;

 

 

(v)

it was a real concern that with the reduction in resources, members of staff were not being put under sustained pressure; there were tools in place for staff to actively manage stress, although overall there was no evidence that this was currently an issue.

 

The Board agreed that the absence report will form part of the quarterly monitoring report provided to the Board which will include –

 

 

?

private sector comparators;

 

?

local authority comparators (family group);

 

?

breakdown of reasons for short term absence;

 

?

schools (maintained) data.

 

The Chair thanked the Cabinet Member and officers for attending.

Supporting documents: