Agenda item
ABSENCE REPORT (COUNCIL AND SCHOOLS)
The Co-operative Scrutiny Board will be asked to consider the Absence Report (Council and Schools).
Minutes:
The Deputy Leader, the Interim Assistant Director for HR and OD and the Head of HR presented the absence report (council and schools) which highlighted the following key areas –
(a) |
the report reviewed the rolling year to date sickness absence across the authority (including schools) by comparing sickness absence against targets and labour market data (where available); |
||
|
|
||
(b) |
the Council was responsible for a total of 40 schools (either Community or Voluntary Controlled Schools); |
||
|
|
||
(c)
|
the total number of days lost in schools was 14,307.30 (rolling year to date) which equated to an average of 7.71 lost days per full time equivalent (FTE) (3.27%); |
||
|
|
||
(d)
|
the total number of days lost across the authority was 18,372.33 (rolling year to date) which equated to an average of 7.55 lost days per (FTE) (3.20%); |
||
|
|
||
(e) |
corporate sickness remained under target; sickness had decreased by half a day per employee, as compared to an average of 8.05 per (FTE) in August 2015; |
||
|
|
||
(f) |
the Council’s target was an average of 8.49 days (FTE), compared to the public sector average of 8.7 days lost; the private sector average hours lost to sickness was 1.8% (although it was unclear whether this percentage was for short term absence only which was normally the figure reported within the private sector); |
||
|
|
||
(g) |
the top six reasons for short term absence across the authority (including schools) were - |
||
|
|
||
|
? |
cold/flu |
|
|
? |
musculoskeletal |
|
|
? |
stress/depression and psychological; |
|
|
? |
stomach/gastric; |
|
|
? |
respiratory; |
|
|
? |
ear nose and throat; |
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
there were a range of approaches used to manage sickness absence which included - |
||
|
|
||
|
? |
the implementation of a Workplace Wellbeing Charter; |
|
|
? |
an Employee Assistance Programme; |
|
|
? |
access to Occupational Health services. |
|
The Board sought further information relating to –
(i) |
the take-up of the flu jab by employees in previous years; |
|
|
|
|
(j) |
the cost of absence to the authority in terms of both money and productivity. |
The Board requested that future absence reports included a breakdown of sickness information by directorate and department.
In response to questions raised by Members, it was reported that –
(k) |
managers were fully trained on sickness absence monitoring and were clear on what was expected; each case should be reviewed compassionately whilst balancing that against the need to deliver a service; HR advisers were able to offer both guidance and support during this process; |
|
|
|
|
(l) |
the Staffroom pages on the intranet provided staff with information relating to policies, procedures and health initiatives; line managers were able to provide this information to staff who did not have access to the website; |
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
long term sick employees would be referred to the occupational health service; a copy of their role profile and the reason for their absences would also be provided; advice would be sought on whether the employee would be able to return to their role; |
|
|
|
|
(m) |
trade union representatives were fully engaged in supporting staff (who were trade union members) through the capability process; |
|
|
|
|
(o) |
reasonable adjustments would be made to support individuals with a disability to work for the Council; |
|
|
|
|
(p) |
Occupational Health are able to provide additional information, to that provided by a GP, as they can examine the impact the medical condition has on the employees ability to carry out the role in which they are employed. |
The Chair thanked the Deputy Leader (Councillor Smith) and officers (Marion Fanthorpe and Jane Stephenson) for attending the meeting.
Supporting documents: