No. |
Item |
12. |
To Note the Appointment of the Joint Chair (Plymouth City Council) and to Appoint a Joint Chair from Cornwall Council
Minutes:
The Joint Committee
agreed to note the appointment of Councillor Shayer from Plymouth
City Council as Joint Chair for the municipal year
2022-23.
The Joint Committee
agreed to appoint Councillor Ewert as
Joint Chair from Cornwall County Council for the municipal year
2022-23.
|
13. |
Apologies
To receive
apologies for non-attendance submitted by Joint Committee
Members.
Minutes:
Apologies had been received from Councillors
Kelly, Rennie, Lennox Boyd and Daw.
|
14. |
Declarations of Interest
Members will be asked to make
any declarations of interest in respect of items on this
agenda.
Minutes:
There were no declarations of
interest.
|
15. |
Minutes PDF 231 KB
To confirm the minutes of the
meeting held on 19 Novembr 2021 as a correct record.
Minutes:
The Joint Committee agreed the
minutes from the meeting held on 19 November 2021.
|
16. |
Chair's Urgent Business
To receive reports on business,
which in the opinion of the Chair, should be
brought forward for urgent consideration.
Minutes:
There
were no items of urgent business from the Chair.
|
17. |
Appointment of Co-opted Representative
The Joint Committee will be asked to consider
the appointment of a Co-opted Representative.
Minutes:
The Joint Committee agreed to co-opt
Ged Edgcumbe, Chair of Friends of Mount Edgcumbe Country Park.
|
18. |
Presentation on the Mount Edgcumbe Woodland Plan
Minutes:
Matt Jackson Chief Executive of Land and
Heritage delivered a presentation to the Joint Committee and
highlighted the following key points:
a)
|
Land and Heritage was an environmental
consultation company that dealt with heritage landscape
conservation and woodland creation in Devon, Cornwall and
Leeds;
|
b)
|
The target had been to have 500 hectares of
woodland planted in two years around Plymouth and South Devon,
Mount Edgcumbe had been contacted to assess whether the Country
park and estate would fit into the project. The Project would see
woodland planting, fencing and maintenance undertaken and funded by
itself receiving no contribution from the Mount Edgcumbe Country
Park and Estate.
|
c)
|
The entire estate had been a grade 1 listed
landscape in Cornwall and the project had been looking to complete
an environmental impact assessment.
|
In
response to questions raised it was reported that:
a)
|
Tree Planting for the project would be logged
under the forest for Cornwall banner;
|
b)
|
Introductions of tree species would be given
careful consideration and would take into account climate change
and the Rame Peninsular’s unique native species with its
micro climate;
|
c)
|
The Project would look into planting a tree to
commemorate Her Majesty Elizabeth II’s 70th
Anniversary of her reign;
|
d)
|
There had been a clear management process in
relation to ash dieback, it had been agreed to delay clearance as
it had been possible to wait and there were no concerns for safety.
This problem would be unavoidable and presented a capital issue for
the Park.
|
|
19. |
Mount Edgcumbe Revenue Outturn 2021/22 PDF 224 KB
Minutes:
Councillor Mark Shayer presented the item to
the Joint Committee. The Joint Committee agreed to:
1)
Note the financial position contained in the report
along with the risks, issues and any mitigating actions;
2)
Note the capital programme and proposals to be
presented to Plymouth City Council’s Investment
Board.
|
20. |
Park Managers Report PDF 188 KB
Minutes:
Chris Burton (Park Manager) presented a report
to the Joint Committee and highlighted the following key
points:
a)
|
The Park had settled into a new normal
approach and had been working without restriction for six months.
The Park and Country estate continued to act as the green lung for
Plymouth and had recently welcomed thousands of children to a
week long activity session;
|
b)
|
The Country Park and Estate had, through
various commercial activities, become financially independent from
Plymouth City Council and Cornwall County Council;
|
c)
|
COVID had a negative impact on the Park in
relation to its core volunteers which had significantly reduced.
Chris Burton advised the Joint Committee that they had been
attempting to rejuvenate the volunteer programme;
|
d)
|
The Park Manager had been working on drafting
a development plan which included a buildings development plan in
consultation with Historic England, it was hoped that the
Development plan would be with the Joint Committee for approval in
approximately two years;
|
e)
|
Parking machines had now progressed to provide
payments over the phone and it had been planned to increase the
offer to include machines that could accept contactless payments.
This would support a move away from solely cash machines;
|
f)
|
Numerous events at the park continued to take
place consistently, the park would cover its costs through ground
rent or through a percentage of turnover;
|
g)
|
Lady Emma’s cottage had been a success
story and was a derelict property until a private individual bought
the lease and set the cottage up as a holiday let. Through the Park
Managers connections another individual visited the cottage and
bought the cottage before returning it to the Park for its own
use.
|
h)
|
The English Garden House got to the last six
for a previous heritage lottery fund bid. The Country Park and
Estate had been in discussions with Catherine Marlow with a view to
receiving possible future grants. Should this be unsuccessful the
Park and Estates would pay £20,000 a year on the
building;
|
i)
|
The Holiday let portfolio saw the introduction
of Rame Head lookout in May 2022, this
had also been converted from a disused building and provided the
park with increased revenue. The Holiday let portfolio had recorded
high levels of occupancy throughout the year and the Park had
established a good partnership with Classic Cottages;
|
j)
|
The Park manager continued to ensure that the
park was free to everyone and balanced its different user groups
effectively;
|
In
response to questions raised it was reported that:
a)
|
The Garden Battery would tell the story of the
house, Battery, Park and its role in Plymouth Sound as a critically
important defensive structure for Plymouth;
|
b)
|
All reports completed for the Park would be
made available on the Mount Edgcumbe
website. All papers relating to the Joint Committee would also be
published on the website;
|
c)
|
The Park continued to look into bringing
electric bikes and scooter to the park which would link in to other
areas in ...
view the full minutes text for item 20.
|
|
21. |
Friends of Mount Edgcumbe Country Park Update PDF 590 KB
Minutes:
Ged Edgcumbe,
Chair of the Friends of Mount Edgcumbe
presented an update to members of the Joint Committee and
highlighted the following key points:
a)
|
The membership of the Friends of Mount
Edgcumbe Country Park agreed on 3 April
2022 to proposed changed which had been required by the Charity
Commission;
|
b)
|
Membership of the Group had increased from its
lowest of 550 during COVID lockdowns to 675 members in August
2022;
|
c)
|
The cancellation of events during the pandemic
significantly impacted fund raising efforts, yet despite this the
FOMECP provided £26,795 of funding for 2021 for projects in
the pack. In 2022 the FOMECP supported four significant projects in
bedding plants (£3,500), Education shelter (£7,500),
resurfacing of road adjacent to the Barrow Centre (£20,000)
and the repair of statues Athena and Diana the Huntress
(£10,000) with a total contribution of £41,000;
|
d)
|
Membership costs for a family of four had cost
£20 a year and included 25% discounts on anything bought in
the Orangery; 20% discount on purchases at business in the park and
reduced annual parking fees;
|
e)
|
The FOMECP had continued to target an increase
in members that were younger in age with the aim of increasing the
cohort of younger volunteers;
|
f)
|
The FOMECP successfully continued to manage
events which contributed positively significant finances to the
Park;
|
In
response to questions raised it was reported that:
a)
|
The Monitoring Officer for Plymouth City
Council would provide advice as to whether Members were able to be
part of the FOMECP and also be part of the Mount Edgcumbe Joint Committee.
|
|