Agenda item
TREASURY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2010/11 - MID-YEAR REVIEW
- Meeting of Audit and Governance Committee, Monday 15 November 2010 2.00 pm, NEW (Item 52.)
- View the background to item 52.
The Director for Corporate Support will submit the Treasury Management Strategy 2010/11 - Mid-Year Review.
Minutes:
The Assistant Director for Finance, Assets and Efficiencies gave an overview of the report and its highlights which included that the City Council –
· had reduced its overall borrowing by £6.977m
· had repaid a debt of £33.9m to Devon County Council
· was currently only investing in UK institutions and for periods of no longer than 12 months
· was forecasting a favourable revenue outturn of £0.139m
· was continuing to challenge Icelandic investments through the Local Government Association and Bevan Brittan
It was also reported that, in looking forward, the Council would –
· consider making investments of up to 2 years in order to benefit from higher interest rates
· upon the advice of our professional advisors, look to increase its counter-party list to include top credit rated organizations outside of the UK
· optimise short term borrowing rates
· continue to balance risk versus return
In response to questions raised, Members were advised that -
(a) |
|
cash projection updates were done daily as part of an automated process linked to the Council’s creditors/payroll system;
|
(b) |
|
the Council had had to pay part year interest repaying the Devon debt. This transaction was financially beneficial for Plymouth, generating a full year revenue saving of approximately £150k, whilst giving the Council flexibility of managing the debt itself;
|
(c) |
|
the availability of a version of the November 2010 revised Treasury Management Practices, highlighting changes from the previous version, would be made available to the Committee;
|
(d) |
|
the Council had a policy of paying suppliers in line with agreed terms of trade and service standards and was performing well in this regard;
|
(e) |
|
instructions for banking of receipts were set out in the Council’s Financial Regulations, however, it was acknowledged that this could be improved and a piece of work was currently being undertaken to help tighten up the income collection process. Officers would investigate the delay in processing cheques through the Lord Mayor’s Parlour;
|
(f) |
|
the Council’s Treasury Management advisors, Arlingclose, had been appointed in January 2009, shortly after the collapse of the Icelandic banks. The Council had not made any long-term financial investments since this appointment as its policy response was to keep investment maturities to a maximum of 12 months;
|
(g) |
|
there were still a few longer-term investments in the system, made before October 2010, that exceed 12 months in duration, for example a sum of £3m invested in Barclays at a rate of 7.1%;
|
(h) |
|
Regarding Icelandic investments, no calculations had been done to estimate what would have been received had the money been invested at the current interest rates. |
Agreed –
(1) |
|
that with regard to (c), (d), (e) and (h) above, Officers provide to Committee Members -
· a copy of the revised Treasury Management Practices showing the changes · figures relating to performance against the agreed terms of trade with creditors · a written response to the delay in processing cheques received by the Lord Mayor’s Parlour · a written response on how much interest could have been received from the Icelandic bank investments |
(2) |
|
that the report be noted and commended to Full Council in accordance with Treasury Management Practice (TMP) note 6;
|
(3) |
|
the updated Treasury Management Practices as outlined at Appendix 3 to the report. |
Supporting documents: