Agenda item
CORPORATE PERFORMANCE REPORT QUARTER 2 2014/15
The Co-operative Scrutiny Board will receive the corporate performance report quarter 2 2014/15 and the Local Government Ombudsman annual review letter 2014.
Minutes:
Peter Honeywell (Transformation Programme Manager) presented the corporate plan performance monitoring quarter 2 report, which highlighted the following key points –
(a) |
the quarter 2 report outlined progress and emerging trends of the Corporate plan and progress of the new 50 Pledges; |
||
|
|
||
(b) |
the majority of the Corporate Plan key actions were on target to achieve their milestones in order that the outcomes were completed by the end of 2016/17; |
||
|
|
||
(c) |
of the 42 key actions - |
||
|
|
||
|
? |
one (K41) (not on target) (RED); |
|
|
? |
four (milestones had not been completed but there were mitigating factors which means that the outcome is not at risk (AMBER) (K27(B), K39, K44, K49); |
|
|
|
||
(d) |
of the 25 performance measures tracking outcomes of the Corporate Plan, the majority were performing well; one (P17 – the percentage of residents who believed they could influence decisions affecting their local area) was below target; action was being taken to find better ways of improving the measure; |
||
|
|
||
(e) |
16 measures were performing well; the remaining five (P10, P18, P21, P22 and P23) were 15 percent or less below target; there were two performance measures which were still to be developed and no data currently existed; |
||
|
|
||
(f) |
the Local Government Ombudsman found that only 10 complaints out of 82 had been upheld. |
||
In response to questions raised by Members, it was reported that –
(g) |
whilst a number of the Pledges had been completed there were a number which remained outstanding; Pledge 19 would be completed in December following consideration by Cabinet; |
|
|
|
|
(h) |
an engagement campaign would be launched in January 2015 to encourage people to register to vote; the University of Plymouth had also undertaken a campaign to encourage its students to register; |
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
it was acknowledged that the Your Plymouth Panel’s review of the Customer Service Strategy 2015-2018, chaired by Councillor Kate Taylor had achieved some good outcomes; |
|
|
|
|
(j) |
the data used for Pledge 17 (percent of residents who believe they can influence decisions affecting their local area) was based on historical surveys such as the ‘place survey’; |
|
|
|
|
(k) |
there was a focus within the Council’s Customer Service Strategy 2015-2018 for improving communications with its customers and making it easier for them to interact with the Council; work was being undertaken to enable the better use of small screen device when accessing Council services; |
|
|
|
|
(l) |
a total of 77 complaints/enquiries had been considered by the Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) in 2013/14; although the LGO had made 82 decision in 2013/14 (the discrepancy with the figures had arisen as five complaints/enquiries had been received in the previous year 2012/13). |
The Board requested information relating to –
(m) |
the locations that had been identified within the city for 20mph zone schemes (Pledge 23); |
|
|
(n) |
looking at the process to make it easier for residents to participate in the online consultation for the Plymouth Plan; |
|
|
(o) |
the provision of a detailed breakdown of the complaints which had been upheld and those that had not which had been considered by the Local Government Ombudsman. |
The Chair thanked Peter Honeywell (Transformation Programmes Manager) for attending the meeting.
Supporting documents:
- CorporatePerformanceReportQuarter2201415, item 85. PDF 109 KB
- AppendixACorporatePlanReportonaPage, item 85. PDF 199 KB
- AppendicesBCorporatePlanMonitoringHighlights201415Q2, item 85. PDF 288 KB
- AppendicesCCorporatePlanPerformanceReport201415Q2, item 85. PDF 387 KB
- AppendicesD50newpledgesSeptemberCabPlanning2014, item 85. PDF 93 KB
- Scrutiny-Report-OmbusdmanReview2014-V1.0, item 85. PDF 49 KB
- Appendix to Scrutiny Report, item 85. PDF 37 KB
- Plymouth-AnnualReviewLetter 2014, item 85. PDF 25 KB